220 10582 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Daniel_Kr=FCgler?= Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Proposed new Class Access Modifier "restricted" to be used like public, protected, private, etc. Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 20:14:56 +0200 Lines: 24 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: <84bbe8b7-25ab-4975-bf32-e41531fe7319@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1399659304 4381 80.91.229.3 (9 May 2014 18:15:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 18:15:04 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBCT7RVFA4QORBINWWSNQKGQEBV744GI@isocpp.org Fri May 09 20:14:58 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-ee0-f72.google.com ([74.125.83.72]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WipJy-0007TE-2N for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 May 2014 20:14:58 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-ee0-f72.google.com with SMTP id d49sf2717983eek.11 for ; Fri, 09 May 2014 11:14:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=w38E3mx2DQDpQ6AbcDEKuQR9PYzOSWb1fl81iH2e22U=; b=IEVKW/jeznhO7bWS0LgoA6ny5UMPdJLMEaaACQ970uY+jvhnFAt9sT57QPib7cQvz6 mwQ7Mguc7XPJtxrwmv+reCLFH6ArRMittBz2I7UimPO49/emBWn/4OSDRHbL+4zlBxZ6 +wq49a6H4JP0OOmpgo1Jqai32uPnljTPNCVbp7vpnm87+jzy2D29nQGuLcrAlNDnihAI JvjkV8vJe5WJzVJifNDRmXBmaPJL5cV56P9D5JSb8j7O7/fiPoHr+qYQznUoRoEfSV3v 5qh3HLX1cnatBrXp7mu6yWLPe/3lMMK2VZH+0Zq68ljv2MpvIxWAykvoq23bnqZfUs8K xeNA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnzfdcVoKRFLulqPgNxHWYYHXjEME7SdHGZVBDYCkVjTyu9dq+PU4H9a+Fhhl5fMmVzeb9X X-Received: by 10.112.85.197 with SMTP id j5mr487lbz.20.1399659297767; Fri, 09 May 2014 11:14:57 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.180.75.42 with SMTP id z10ls423222wiv.31.canary; Fri, 09 May 2014 11:14:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.82.35 with SMTP id f3mr9789154wjy.36.1399659296562; Fri, 09 May 2014 11:14:56 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x230.google.com (mail-wi0-x230.google.com [2a00:1450:400c:c05::230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id el4si79991wid.29.2014.05.09.11.14.56 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 09 May 2014 11:14:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of daniel.kruegler@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::230 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c05::230; Original-Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id n15so1750681wiw.3 for ; Fri, 09 May 2014 11:14:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.11.137 with SMTP id q9mr4517456wib.13.1399659296274; Fri, 09 May 2014 11:14:56 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.217.151.130 with HTTP; Fri, 9 May 2014 11:14:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <84bbe8b7-25ab-4975-bf32-e41531fe7319@isocpp.org> X-Original-Sender: daniel.kruegler@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of daniel.kruegler@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::230 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=daniel.kruegler@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:10582 Archived-At: 2014-05-09 20:03 GMT+02:00 : > > I Propose a new Class Access Modifier "restricted" to be used like public, > protected, private, etc. > > Sometimes it would be nice to have a 4th Class Access Modifier, I'll call it > "restricted", which would be similar to "private", but which would provide > restricted access to members, methods, etc., > ONLY within the File where the Class was defined (generally the .h file). The standard does not require that source code is stored in files, the notion of /source file/ in C++ does only exist conceptually, so in which sense do you suggest to define the "file"? - Daniel -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/. .