220 10007 <9a4f69df-79e9-4d7b-be4b-9b4a5c9506af@isocpp.org> article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: wsemmelink@gmail.com Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Re: Suggestion for a compile-time error if a virtual destructor lacks in polymorphic base class Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 13:46:34 -0700 (PDT) Lines: 62 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: <9a4f69df-79e9-4d7b-be4b-9b4a5c9506af@isocpp.org> References: <60c2b7e2-5ac4-49a9-9b23-9ab499cf827e@isocpp.org> <9df6c78d-bca0-4e56-b80f-5a1489a8c9e0@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_649_16883115.1395693994720" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1395693988 2805 80.91.229.3 (24 Mar 2014 20:46:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 20:46:28 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBDRYRNWV3YIRBK5TYKMQKGQEZG32IZA@isocpp.org Mon Mar 24 21:46:38 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-pa0-f69.google.com ([209.85.220.69]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WSBlV-0007z2-E5 for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 21:46:37 +0100 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-f69.google.com with SMTP id fb1sf15992220pad.8 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 13:46:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=JcJHE8eBpQXPYqvQUGVkBY1rahIt6NiKNAyXhS86Hjw=; b=XtqRSfB3vq1R/RF8WSE2l8gf4YHC/c/aSViWLIczUZZjZa0sSA5DSwA6IfwCx59ZFZ qMI7WQhL/v3tTVjtZzbhcSqGYc4hwF2nX0bV8ey8jnw2zM+jpLzVa5v7qDlgOHrBkX2d jTLGSLvyrJkf7B5qBmYcEB2vPM902YJnBrokJAV7d2AoOBfSHBeU2mRafansiqYssNXO RUcwvUwEG0FgGgiJnpcepDU9dSEdovD4IiouMGaQFOnhIlhQhJ5ow1F9Rvf7foLE0gy1 1NktX2G5CGS55u/B0Eyo+iOOX8zNrhNLjJ0Tf6WqHJAiu3kp7asLUSE/alfYHrShFQy0 k8mw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence :mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=JcJHE8eBpQXPYqvQUGVkBY1rahIt6NiKNAyXhS86Hjw=; b=JGYWvtZX4CC3Q1WZvrB0zVAHcA643ZMeqM3nt7XLv2tsMtHJxRsc59KuTVH8ixFYwm Xzy9W7KA0A9+cdUOptko+2wGi7KV+TGYqrkLwjfJ4+zLGDwtsbJIF7srNaeN3/bavyk/ wMlFXydFGx76DXVuPE1QXI2lrwtypVdrl+mNrHN4BpyOWEbe/B6uufPxjaWGF3dQs3dI Q3vUJ40JnkFkLGE9vQzV6R5bw2Xj1JlAVwU1ry7aBId+ezj7DFygABPmAPMAAJi32DM6 ZG7PGSz8qaCcUnfmUhMSKWrHIgVf9/lcVQdrZpe9uqd5GMvET7Cp3u+SrVpWEqsHEkmM g94A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkQNBFIA0EP2z0pgXcSkKqHMw6/iC599A0/q/4YZKyqf8kdNPeFCg9AKYcne+tY0zKQ12+f X-Received: by 10.66.144.228 with SMTP id sp4mr26747188pab.5.1395693996221; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 13:46:36 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.182.1.196 with SMTP id 4ls860849obo.82.gmail; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 13:46:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.182.200.163 with SMTP id jt3mr37794obc.25.1395693995364; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 13:46:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: wsemmelink@gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:10007 Archived-At: ------=_Part_649_16883115.1395693994720 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > /Wall, though that will result in 800 lines of 'warnings'. > > > Thanks Olaf, I made my last post before yours came through. It looks like I could do the check with /W3, and it then fortunately did not generate hundreds of warnings - only the two 4265 warnings. I was also able to elevate them to error level with #pragma warning(error:4265) Thanks, everyone, I hope this thread did not waste your time, as I certainly learned something very useful, and I hope it may help someone else also landing here via a search. -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/. ------=_Part_649_16883115.1395693994720 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 

/Wall, though that will result in 800 lines of 'warnings'.

 
Thanks Olaf, I made my last post before you= rs came through.
It looks like I could do the check with /W3, and it th= en fortunately did not generate hundreds of warnings - only the two 4265 wa= rnings.
I was also able to elevate them to error level with
#pragma = warning(error:4265)

Thanks, everyone, I hope this thread did not was= te your time, as I certainly learned something very useful, and I hope it m= ay help someone else also landing here via a search.

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposa= ls+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/<= /a>.
------=_Part_649_16883115.1395693994720-- .