220 8866 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Felipe Magno de Almeida Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Comments on 2d api for c++ N3888.pdf Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 18:06:49 -0200 Lines: 41 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: <9105f9b2-e15d-4bf8-a4a1-65ebc3657eb0@isocpp.org> <3766829.y6foiXVjg7@tjmaciei-mobl2> <16575659.VFgV8LhWkF@tjmaciei-mobl2> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1390853238 16577 80.91.229.3 (27 Jan 2014 20:07:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 20:07:18 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBCL7ZKXVZICRB6PYTKLQKGQEZBI2KAY@isocpp.org Mon Jan 27 21:07:26 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-wg0-f69.google.com ([74.125.82.69]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W7sSo-0005h5-G8 for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 21:07:22 +0100 Original-Received: by mail-wg0-f69.google.com with SMTP id l18sf12742358wgh.0 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:07:22 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=qj9SlYF/xFzYFYLgkOkS2q95/fxZzl1uZYFn9mGrX3A=; b=gizXhODWmaUUOJe3SEcF6fSJztqo4y7O7sEt4tbO4XPWZyGtLG9NOVYT/lly+VttGX XFZABlmVORhh9jqi2Tt953ZEKRepUkk8ELesDsuE2PyS0Tql4oSTFhjFmT+7Q/1aK7Ed /MwlrS/r8eI/tf9+WDEty7GQ3vxKn/BypSctId10MfmaOhFBidFhOdsPh1lkya9ZeXkH lbATeCU4Oo3qDvtZ+5pafvkP/Tz+k/iah+joFV8K61liYjeruJ6wOtRySXAxj/RCTU9t 0HMyMlcJz1aRcbIav69jrRsSTj+OIFDIBYbIxMaZ4vVHcRY3i99xxm5Ud3PHCKYB7dls soAA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkm62rszm+2KykTK+W1ec3lTYB8wdnibT3SarGojhXLOkuKIX+fQK9efJn0/0fxLQlsVtEY X-Received: by 10.112.62.138 with SMTP id y10mr9799960lbr.18.1390853242048; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:07:22 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.180.91.51 with SMTP id cb19ls973896wib.47.gmail; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:07:20 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.205.34.140 with SMTP id ss12mr2210775bkb.121.1390853240961; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:07:20 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from mail-ie0-x22b.google.com (mail-ie0-x22b.google.com [2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22b]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ou7si15624679bkb.216.2014.01.27.12.07.20 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:07:20 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of felipe.m.almeida@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22b as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22b; Original-Received: by mail-ie0-f171.google.com with SMTP id as1so6492573iec.16 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:07:19 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.42.97.193 with SMTP id p1mr23409276icn.32.1390853239544; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:07:19 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.50.150.196 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:06:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <16575659.VFgV8LhWkF@tjmaciei-mobl2> X-Original-Sender: felipe.m.almeida@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of felipe.m.almeida@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22b as permitted sender) smtp.mail=felipe.m.almeida@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:8866 Archived-At: On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On segunda-feira, 27 de janeiro de 2014 15:45:25, Felipe Magno de Almeida > wrote: >> > You could call it a quality-of-implementation issue and allow the >> > implementation to use extern templates for the known and common image >> > formats. But I suggest that we *first* get the algorithms for what really >> > matters settled down, then we figure out how or if they should be made >> > generic. >> Isn't it what Cairo has already done? What C++ needs is a generic >> drawing library, not another wrapper over cairo. IMO. > > I'm arguing that we need an efficient C++ library more than we need a generic > one. So I'm arguing to *first* get what matters, and then generalise. If what you mean by first is that it is included to the C++ standard library, then I would be against. Not that I can vote :). If you meant someone writing a new C++ library, then I'm always for it. The more the merrier, of course. > Just look at the bikeshed discussions in the SG7 mailing list over what type > we should use for "pixel" and "point". > > -- > Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org > Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center > PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint: > E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358 Regards, -- Felipe Magno de Almeida -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/. .