220 8496 <52CF3AB0.7090102@gmail.com> article
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: David Krauss <potswa@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals
Subject: Re: A new keyword for either a type or a variable
 (typical use case for variadic template template)?
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 08:11:28 +0800
Lines: 17
Approved: news@gmane.org
Message-ID: <52CF3AB0.7090102@gmail.com>
References: <f4ec2cca-5951-447f-a938-0b2e5e3e233f@isocpp.org>	<-5123564187529511709@gmail297201516>	<52CB7506.1000906@gmail.com>	<CAOfiQqk4rRTRFX3dbcq33z2C190ZHUGRVUhM0WRJehPZEwFJ8g@mail.gmail.com>	<62bda680-3dd7-4be8-8ac5-0d2e08bf6d99@isocpp.org>	<CAOfiQq=fvi-mzf6mP4B2XBgCeHfimX857Jff+Nz=iUeHW5W1nw@mail.gmail.com>	<52CDFB2D.4050703@gmail.com>	<-9126987679220332623@gmail297201516>	<52CE0F54.5020800@gmail.com> <CAOfiQqmi3UHRSvgQB_5ZdWrM3oRog4RpgsighU2a3p6HjoVq8g@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1389312706 9265 80.91.229.3 (10 Jan 2014 00:11:46 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 00:11:46 +0000 (UTC)
To: std-proposals@isocpp.org
Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBCW25A7E3QCRBRHVXSLAKGQE26DD64A@isocpp.org Fri Jan 10 01:11:52 2014
Return-path: <std-proposals+bncBCW25A7E3QCRBRHVXSLAKGQE26DD64A@isocpp.org>
Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mail-ie0-f198.google.com ([209.85.223.198])
	by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <std-proposals+bncBCW25A7E3QCRBRHVXSLAKGQE26DD64A@isocpp.org>)
	id 1W1PhW-0005KY-Rm
	for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 01:11:51 +0100
Original-Received: by mail-ie0-f198.google.com with SMTP id x13sf618347ief.1
        for <gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org>; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 16:11:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to
         :subject:references:in-reply-to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe
         :list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=9HWYcbXJFjqLmMtW8nREq0jYiTCrVImVyV28aWs4Buk=;
        b=WBSkJybUkS33kgUVI9ShkuL0px8X4FhNCbRjaS56kQV7Tn3wGpL+LrnkBjPmIYMjlG
         /CwEtkYP7357XyerwQZj7ZuQMpS1NIzo/5CqR7MkAzVM+z4oD0CEr4QCJkUgrlWz7zxi
         KhjjWKdIqCsuYJqTMcNMfrn83IJqz7KrZYzUen3Yyy09gUZHbm6y+EM6tmF+DJa+TdCT
         Ai/mCs54+JlX/RtIm7Z04BMSqBtlTpcyFOelvvA/j5UWl0dNLOtc7zX+eKcYBCk+kXuV
         +NF//QvYjEQ4H6aYiNnMPDcTzUQxOzQR1cXX6VhFkTD4bBc//BJ9b3Ewt+oehAsE0osY
         gppw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlX1b07UkUXpahOmRF4UL3F3LMv9+TaPQYFlWnUHh5Hik/p198JTjc/4ejElW8ilmnhpR3F
X-Received: by 10.182.230.168 with SMTP id sz8mr2395884obc.9.1389312709652;
        Thu, 09 Jan 2014 16:11:49 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org
Original-Received: by 10.49.121.98 with SMTP id lj2ls1349261qeb.45.gmail; Thu, 09 Jan
 2014 16:11:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.226.65 with SMTP id a61mr7987910yhq.109.1389312708899;
        Thu, 09 Jan 2014 16:11:48 -0800 (PST)
Original-Received: from mail-pa0-x235.google.com (mail-pa0-x235.google.com [2607:f8b0:400e:c03::235])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i68si6684535yhq.45.2014.01.09.16.11.48
        for <std-proposals@isocpp.org>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Thu, 09 Jan 2014 16:11:48 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of potswa@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::235 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400e:c03::235;
Original-Received: by mail-pa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id hz1so3964128pad.26
        for <std-proposals@isocpp.org>; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 16:11:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.66.66.202 with SMTP id h10mr7100401pat.70.1389312708060;
        Thu, 09 Jan 2014 16:11:48 -0800 (PST)
Original-Received: from Davids-MacBook-Pro.local ([121.54.44.159])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id by1sm12703802pbd.25.2014.01.09.16.11.36
        for <std-proposals@isocpp.org>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Thu, 09 Jan 2014 16:11:46 -0800 (PST)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOfiQqmi3UHRSvgQB_5ZdWrM3oRog4RpgsighU2a3p6HjoVq8g@mail.gmail.com>
X-Original-Sender: potswa@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;       spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of potswa@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::235 as permitted
 sender) smtp.mail=potswa@gmail.com;       dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com;
       dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org
List-ID: <std-proposals.isocpp.org>
X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/post>, <mailto:std-proposals@isocpp.org>
List-Help: <http://support.google.com/a/isocpp.org/bin/topic.py?topic=25838>, <mailto:std-proposals+help@isocpp.org>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/>
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/subscribe>,
 <mailto:std-proposals+subscribe@isocpp.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/subscribe>,
 <mailto:googlegroups-manage+399137483710+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:8496
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals/8496>

On 1/9/14 11:18 AM, Richard Smith wrote:
> The useful thing about introducing a new feature is that you get to specify
> how it works =) Naturally, we would specify that passing a generic template
> argument to another template preserves the kind of template argument.

But how can you make that work without redoing how parsers must classify 
type-dependent expressions? And what's the benefit, given that 
overloading/partial specialization already solve the problem?

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/.

.
