220 8382 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: fmatthew5876@gmail.com Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Proposal: Default swap operation Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 21:11:40 -0800 (PST) Lines: 88 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: <25282740.R0qdXlWiI6@tjmaciei-mobl2> <52C46F6D.7080303@gmail.com> <4890722.aJTBCHXWVh@tjmaciei-mobl2> <320a5135-1841-4fae-9dca-e0b3c582db85@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_6509_11485628.1388725900376" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1388725897 19392 80.91.229.3 (3 Jan 2014 05:11:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 05:11:37 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBDELF54RTIGRBDMNTGLAKGQEP3XC3HY@isocpp.org Fri Jan 03 06:11:43 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-qc0-f199.google.com ([209.85.216.199]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vyx2t-0000vo-1Y for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 06:11:43 +0100 Original-Received: by mail-qc0-f199.google.com with SMTP id i17sf18433158qcy.10 for ; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 21:11:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=R9Hx/gnF8DXnzRLX5GsNiI6llBhNIuSaibVZzlrSnS4=; b=jUndxAOQvbJ7em+miSRN3snpU36Ng7arfDhuqDwFaP7z/64v+EG7dA5Lg3I53vX8d2 b9DD9o8JaETXOwkDurTpW5Qbz3CCUV+Bkb0G2XRowPTnzWiiSScMDpBTHTSDK0fDz4IK j/dImVJe5fr9CN8NYOKTxLxPl6YWLSd9fKeMKAC59p6coci5iL+ouGMsfRAeLojGHa+q w99iq2UgYDnA+AFeytHb3uvgZ3ntAx3u5SIx/9CgeXhSgz6YOMF5lAwqRq0GL5+ifueW iHDSBEO9vMg4uQvT4Giq8L4/B+/rqteA57bv8/HL2vfklTJLl+P2HF1MIKJsmVn+d3P3 PhxQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence :mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=R9Hx/gnF8DXnzRLX5GsNiI6llBhNIuSaibVZzlrSnS4=; b=U0dbphqbhvXvMHzej9f+F3EtvXdymSjPHHj7BXM4atDSo8iDYYs2G7OAamVCWD54CI xzn2PpRm6lHoQkIrNuvEc+beHCG5N2oViVoOJxzU/lVSWD8LgTkFv6flqdiUggP6/Nta NPVerbSKEDHEOrEXIbNWLba6kCchCv3HiBIQmUqQKVT4kNQOg1uaUEhCFTHVLyFWiuaj tbhkLTxZ6NnI1V11S3JFFyrNKM5lFNFWewshJrAvnxLTIJGz602LFQw7r/Wi+VQqaryy 1P5RImHec2H6hJUDsMo2Q6Zj8yXLdMG9KE3jVsB+tvBAnZ7bXx/TR6CV/6pZuLRryJJ0 2wPQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk0wShble32dLYquIvFgkFabqQv1yiOSu02s7cJZKzl/dV0EFmnzoIsThC7sxfZgEaQK0v4 X-Received: by 10.58.186.202 with SMTP id fm10mr4300978vec.37.1388725901953; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 21:11:41 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.49.104.76 with SMTP id gc12ls4634867qeb.44.gmail; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 21:11:41 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.49.122.42 with SMTP id lp10mr64015qeb.17.1388725901167; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 21:11:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: fmatthew5876@gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:8382 Archived-At: ------=_Part_6509_11485628.1388725900376 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I like your idea better, but in the event it is not accepted due to the=20 committee being conservative about new operators, this idea would still be= =20 useful. On Wednesday, January 1, 2014 10:25:04 PM UTC-5, Klaim - Jo=EBl Lamotte wro= te: > > > On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 3:33 AM, > wrote= : > >> It has. Everyone, can we get back on topic with the idea of a defaulted= =20 >> swap operator? > > > What about my question about N3746?=20 > http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2013/n3746.pdf > It proposes a swap operator AND a specific behaviour when defaulted (and= =20 > also when deleted), for example in 3.4 (n) section. > Doesnt-it match your requirements? > --=20 ---=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposa= ls/. ------=_Part_6509_11485628.1388725900376 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I like your idea better, but in the event it is not accept= ed due to the committee being conservative about new operators, this idea w= ould still be useful.

On Wednesday, January 1, 2014 10:25:04 PM UTC-= 5, Klaim - Jo=EBl Lamotte wrote:

On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 = at 3:33 AM, <fma= tth...@gmail.com> wrote:
It has. Everyone, can we get back on topic with the idea o= f a defaulted swap operator?

What about my question about N3746? http://www.= open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2013/n3746.pdf
It = proposes a swap operator AND a specific behaviour when defaulted (and also = when deleted), for example in 3.4 (n) section.
Doesnt-it match your requirements?

--
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/<= /a>.
------=_Part_6509_11485628.1388725900376-- .