220 8328 <-414611097405781448@gmail297201516> article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philipp Maximilian Stephani Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Proposal: Default swap operation Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2014 16:41:24 +0000 Lines: 85 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: <-414611097405781448@gmail297201516> References: <68012381-8af4-4d62-a5a4-912c454fba96@isocpp.org> <52C4339B.20701@gmail.com> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3560c073fb004eeeb5909 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1388594483 31142 80.91.229.3 (1 Jan 2014 16:41:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2014 16:41:23 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBD35NAXJW4GBBNMKSGLAKGQESATPDEA@isocpp.org Wed Jan 01 17:41:30 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-bk0-f72.google.com ([209.85.214.72]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VyOrH-0003LI-9d for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Jan 2014 17:41:27 +0100 Original-Received: by mail-bk0-f72.google.com with SMTP id mx13sf23909387bkb.7 for ; Wed, 01 Jan 2014 08:41:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=VkHh6cNOlaXvo066NFbAmtuBC4Ge95OQg5i2Ehczh84=; b=dSxXzPgqIo4QHLcsACC/Rq6PFC5SA34O6yGGOVSZu0p0Q6uXbtdKEI9U4PbgismFZi jr19zppehQS8ACdTMq522b2pebYsD1m9laqiTEDhrudy8XYQ75UF1qqvUDiK5GxFP9Ex s4Rz/6mDcAhlkKnEId0ftun8HZ0XYjwrO6/IiRa54mYfROD+E1sqQZRREKxLYrKjUE7g /sZEcxpZpF5F3RP8dBEwEeV7JaS3iW1B2pZRPPFZaJRiA35+C+mx6D3pr/avqwortq4Q LFlri6Vc2+u1e9027mxEoTYwspIdOalsQ40yA0+ufYEylPAEavcijDOfFwdNAkGIXHVE ojTA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkfscTHU1zqXt93wynogw8johoVqGXmkEnidnMMlJ8p3X5NIFxuNTfZFX5CYSmBxy+LbMNi X-Received: by 10.152.4.229 with SMTP id n5mr975649lan.10.1388594486517; Wed, 01 Jan 2014 08:41:26 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.180.109.33 with SMTP id hp1ls1757270wib.50.gmail; Wed, 01 Jan 2014 08:41:25 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.205.98.69 with SMTP id cn5mr480882bkc.70.1388594485587; Wed, 01 Jan 2014 08:41:25 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from mail-lb0-x22d.google.com (mail-lb0-x22d.google.com [2a00:1450:4010:c04::22d]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ln4si16988004bkb.100.2014.01.01.08.41.25 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Jan 2014 08:41:25 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of p.stephani2@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c04::22d as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c04::22d; Original-Received: by mail-lb0-f173.google.com with SMTP id z5so6922142lbh.32 for ; Wed, 01 Jan 2014 08:41:25 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.152.87.142 with SMTP id ay14mr31660586lab.7.1388594485213; Wed, 01 Jan 2014 08:41:25 -0800 (PST) X-Original-Sender: p.stephani2@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of p.stephani2@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c04::22d as permitted sender) smtp.mail=p.stephani2@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:8328 Archived-At: --001a11c3560c073fb004eeeb5909 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed Jan 01 2014 at 16:26:22, Matthew Woehlke wrote: > Related to that note, I wonder if we should allow e.g.: > > foo.h > ----- > class Foo > { > ... > ~Foo(); > ... > } > > foo.cpp > ------- > > Foo::~Foo() = default; > > > IOW, allow uses of '= default' after declaration, to allow the compiler > to emit the default implementation at the source level rather than the > header level. > Huh? I'm pretty sure this is already allowed. -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/. --001a11c3560c073fb004eeeb5909 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed Jan 01 2014 at 16:26:22, Matthew Woehlke <mwoehlke.floss@gmail.com> wrote:
Related to that note, I wonder if we should allow e.g.:

foo.h
-----
class Foo
{
=A0 =A0...
=A0 =A0~Foo();
=A0 =A0...
}

foo.cpp
-------

Foo::~Foo() =3D default;


IOW, allow uses of '=3D default' after declaration, to allow the co= mpiler
to emit the default implementation at the source level rather than the
header level.

Huh? I'm pretty sure = this is already allowed.=A0

--
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/<= /a>.
--001a11c3560c073fb004eeeb5909-- .