220 7657 <CAOU91OO5SNUSKz6ZvskOjt=qurbFce7C81S1mBvJZCeZvdY0xQ@mail.gmail.com> article
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Klaim_=2D_Jo=C3=ABl_Lamotte?= <mjklaim@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals
Subject: Re: Re: Could we remove the size() method in the std::list<T>?
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2013 20:59:50 +0100
Lines: 47
Approved: news@gmane.org
Message-ID: <CAOU91OO5SNUSKz6ZvskOjt=qurbFce7C81S1mBvJZCeZvdY0xQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <9be1f793-a061-4193-8a91-eedc81fa703e@isocpp.org>
	<433a9ee1-0ae3-4af7-ad93-028e416075ad@isocpp.org>
	<CD8CC325-026A-4020-812A-AAF9927B9BBE@gmail.com>
Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2903c100e6b04eac3f1ca
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1384027192 23643 80.91.229.3 (9 Nov 2013 19:59:52 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2013 19:59:52 +0000 (UTC)
To: std-proposals@isocpp.org
Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBD3NR2WQQ4IBBNVI7KJQKGQEM446NTA@isocpp.org Sat Nov 09 20:59:57 2013
Return-path: <std-proposals+bncBD3NR2WQQ4IBBNVI7KJQKGQEM446NTA@isocpp.org>
Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mail-oa0-f69.google.com ([209.85.219.69])
	by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <std-proposals+bncBD3NR2WQQ4IBBNVI7KJQKGQEM446NTA@isocpp.org>)
	id 1VfEhE-00060i-32
	for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2013 20:59:52 +0100
Original-Received: by mail-oa0-f69.google.com with SMTP id i7sf11750351oag.8
        for <gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org>; Sat, 09 Nov 2013 11:59:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe
         :list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=BR+7NDRZsTxstJr5RL6YaAsU+JU8DlsRd7V6QPvicQo=;
        b=P6/8x4RQLOMUTy980IHs4+9Gucj7rahjWcMyxjHu7Tk7k7OD3nJm02VuhhDyQTLyuY
         BrunwvNWX8e/SNotpT64O4wO2rM6fdejoVflV2OOl1dVMsgp6fskcXtqHPCmPEV+i+kb
         XhmOZxarMYsN/lYLIpYaOViExzjqLkT9JEfMkXO1d6yqO02Px8NMUC2Slru//ufV/+mO
         f30BsGXt111zWk80FJESWVAUo6YlIVkLWXotWtJ2GYeCqzDZEhwKaz5XvrNSnpN8+g1M
         Uvrku0FbaJExuuENWsAyLFbhyCyhXIulWXxEj8jbljW6j6epNe7f8l8pxWiEUOQusLv1
         3oaw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlL6wNCDLvmGRjJj1Zqf9BD2rj6er4fRN0EPjcGYlGUWeZg0AcHJqLXkkZ9Ld+vk1Rssq+B
X-Received: by 10.182.138.39 with SMTP id qn7mr6703439obb.37.1384027191152;
        Sat, 09 Nov 2013 11:59:51 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org
Original-Received: by 10.182.131.138 with SMTP id om10ls1327658obb.29.gmail; Sat, 09
 Nov 2013 11:59:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.182.129.201 with SMTP id ny9mr17550114obb.0.1384027190862;
        Sat, 09 Nov 2013 11:59:50 -0800 (PST)
Original-Received: from mail-ob0-x22a.google.com (mail-ob0-x22a.google.com [2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22a])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id sy1si7253481obc.25.2013.11.09.11.59.50
        for <std-proposals@isocpp.org>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Sat, 09 Nov 2013 11:59:50 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of mjklaim@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22a as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22a;
Original-Received: by mail-ob0-f170.google.com with SMTP id gq1so2863626obb.15
        for <std-proposals@isocpp.org>; Sat, 09 Nov 2013 11:59:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.182.28.134 with SMTP id b6mr11089742obh.27.1384027190724;
 Sat, 09 Nov 2013 11:59:50 -0800 (PST)
Original-Received: by 10.76.150.4 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 11:59:50 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CD8CC325-026A-4020-812A-AAF9927B9BBE@gmail.com>
X-Original-Sender: mjklaim@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;       spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of mjklaim@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22a as permitted
 sender) smtp.mail=mjklaim@gmail.com;       dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com;
       dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org
List-ID: <std-proposals.isocpp.org>
X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/post>, <mailto:std-proposals@isocpp.org>
List-Help: <http://support.google.com/a/isocpp.org/bin/topic.py?topic=25838>, <mailto:std-proposals+help@isocpp.org>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/>
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/subscribe>,
 <mailto:std-proposals+subscribe@isocpp.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/subscribe>,
 <mailto:googlegroups-manage+399137483710+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:7657
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals/7657>

--001a11c2903c100e6b04eac3f1ca
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

By the way, let's say the proposal is about deprecating list::size(), would
it be a legitimate for deprecation according to how the commiteee works, or
would it be immediately be rejected without even discussion because it's
used a lot?
If I understand correctly, the committee "rules" (of thumb?) is that
proposing deprecation of anything would imply that a "better" alternative
is proposed too.

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/.

--001a11c2903c100e6b04eac3f1ca
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra">By the way, let&#39;s say the p=
roposal is about deprecating list::size(), would it be a legitimate for dep=
recation according to how the commiteee works, or would it be immediately b=
e rejected without even discussion because it&#39;s used a lot?=A0</div>
<div class=3D"gmail_extra">If I understand correctly, the committee &quot;r=
ules&quot; (of thumb?) is that proposing deprecation of anything would impl=
y that a &quot;better&quot; alternative is proposed too.</div></div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
&nbsp;<br />
--- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.<br />
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/=
std-proposals/">http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/<=
/a>.<br />

--001a11c2903c100e6b04eac3f1ca--

.