220 7565 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philipp Stephani Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Re: Fixing the private method issue Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 03:09:00 +0100 Lines: 61 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: <8d5f90be-ed45-4b42-9ddd-d6e2497c8166@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3675e387b0a04ea5066ed X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1383530940 7368 80.91.229.3 (4 Nov 2013 02:09:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 02:09:00 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBD35NAXJW4GBBPED3SJQKGQE3KTZ77A@isocpp.org Mon Nov 04 03:09:01 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-wg0-f71.google.com ([74.125.82.71]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vd9bB-0002RK-JB for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 03:09:01 +0100 Original-Received: by mail-wg0-f71.google.com with SMTP id b13sf2657612wgh.2 for ; Sun, 03 Nov 2013 18:09:01 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=9+z71xYCGP/1NmO6j0o5Owq5g5FAqcMdJWDfafdDBcI=; b=KwhH1jnAcFaMTQJuwnBOVjdDSBbymXNYhoCyUP4tYyWQY0vZvhczpX/zeaGE8k+8b1 x2cW+tARlMhkkI8M+Yd11pK5rtJotV50pSz/j6l5TtzvFZTv5L80/7MyD1mToI/4aYdb KosLdUfgaLxqjxziLshgxVfAUO6BXcGlLkK7eGU3I0hK5bej3kknqaFOV+3DNS5hzWXj P1NzPTpH0GGUQVa7DvZiUInjRZefCS575dYowxoBQ74mnfqQy+phlYC6/L0U8ncNZU5j qKGFmA39y/Cc/dbDPu2qe+wmCzE52LsNRBq2nHktKyYl0Q/bskNrUJF/5fwJ/GO2sjRF l6nw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl7+fKxgQY7jFuKWOYnzLfizY4E/1HAg68op6UI8jfPK0RlpwdLZbiq9Bk57XyWezV/xSj9 X-Received: by 10.14.210.3 with SMTP id t3mr5225400eeo.5.1383530940823; Sun, 03 Nov 2013 18:09:00 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.180.218.130 with SMTP id pg2ls408014wic.41.canary; Sun, 03 Nov 2013 18:09:00 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.204.71.5 with SMTP id f5mr7822953bkj.1.1383530940482; Sun, 03 Nov 2013 18:09:00 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from mail-la0-x22f.google.com (mail-la0-x22f.google.com [2a00:1450:4010:c03::22f]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b2si2477528bko.97.2013.11.03.18.09.00 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 03 Nov 2013 18:09:00 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of p.stephani2@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c03::22f as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c03::22f; Original-Received: by mail-la0-f47.google.com with SMTP id er20so502041lab.6 for ; Sun, 03 Nov 2013 18:09:00 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.152.116.109 with SMTP id jv13mr36745lab.30.1383530940101; Sun, 03 Nov 2013 18:09:00 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.112.9.235 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 18:09:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: p.stephani2@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of p.stephani2@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c03::22f as permitted sender) smtp.mail=p.stephani2@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:7565 Archived-At: --001a11c3675e387b0a04ea5066ed Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 2013/11/4 Philipp Stephani > I'm not sure whether a restriction should be made to only allow private > nonvirtual functions outside the class definition -- a rule could be added > that the class layout may not be different for any nonzero number of > virtual functions, and the compiler could signal an error if a virtual > function is to be added to a class whose definition doesn't contain any > virtual functions. > This is wrong: As already pointed out by the OP, all virtual functions can be overridden and are therefore part of the interface, regardless of their visibility. -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/. --001a11c3675e387b0a04ea5066ed Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



2013/11/4 Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2@gmail.com>
I'm not sure whether a restriction should be made= to only allow private nonvirtual functions outside the class definition --= a rule could be added that the class layout may not be different for any n= onzero number of virtual functions, and the compiler could signal an error = if a virtual function is to be added to a class whose definition doesn'= t contain any virtual functions.

This is wrong: As already pointed ou= t by the OP, all virtual functions can be overridden and are therefore part= of the interface, regardless of their visibility.=A0

--
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/<= /a>.
--001a11c3675e387b0a04ea5066ed-- .