220 7426 <7c9a2637-65d8-4d54-bd3c-b46c0c22b34f@isocpp.org> article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Evgeny Panasyuk Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Re: To add the method append for all sequential containers that have method push_back Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 14:11:06 -0700 (PDT) Lines: 64 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: <7c9a2637-65d8-4d54-bd3c-b46c0c22b34f@isocpp.org> References: <4167b82e-a3cc-44ce-9825-b52514bc1531@isocpp.org> <357325b0-cec5-4d22-ad56-9bb66f76b458@isocpp.org> <983ff074-5d8c-488a-b06c-49d53d5b7a5b@isocpp.org> <369298d9-3f8b-405a-8bfe-ae209372a26f@isocpp.org> <5266DEEC.7090805@gmail.com> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_397_22731323.1382476266583" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1382476266 3131 80.91.229.3 (22 Oct 2013 21:11:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 21:11:06 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBC54TLGKR4LBB26TTOJQKGQEUS6SVSQ@isocpp.org Tue Oct 22 23:11:11 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-ob0-f198.google.com ([209.85.214.198]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VYjEK-0006CL-Po for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 23:11:09 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-ob0-f198.google.com with SMTP id va2sf27929351obc.1 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 14:11:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=sbWQSp5BIi9AMWU/7Q2gDrqkTNKq0CS0/hBK/n/+EhY=; b=P57ELTkU3BTZN+Uu1uvbrPFs1sXz8Euqlg+0l42FS9gT1z7+TyEfhy/BeHNT0P+jcl PtFfhmTpMEhM+HPXBYHx+EG9gOLkFV8y8W69lxsZR3Gutw/6cVkgAD0Qc61IxiCHofb1 buCKYD8G7kFMeMvDZIcKERh4YdubL46nNAtTGoTfMU+tKFw5mER6jMAhoNGNLC1cgisu Wr09fTfBqEMlb46PE7Hn48jW+QybDxqqV1ataFnoUgRgGH+MpfhT7qpPkYFApouqsMFX SEFIEVuDQ0q1KT0ef7cEWxJP6R1yIJeTyY/NrBIUxmFKFtH83MOK54eADkhK0iZ8F6Vs w0OQ== X-Received: by 10.50.114.66 with SMTP id je2mr8076192igb.5.1382476267766; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 14:11:07 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.49.48.66 with SMTP id j2ls268710qen.90.gmail; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 14:11:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.49.116.145 with SMTP id jw17mr95371qeb.25.1382476267028; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 14:11:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: evgeny.panasyuk@gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:7426 Archived-At: ------=_Part_397_22731323.1382476266583 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > In this case we will have different semantics. In my opinion it is not a > good idea. I am sure that append should be introduced only for sequantial > containers that have method push_back as std::basic_string, std::vector, > std::deque, std::list, and std::x_forward_list > Why not just make non-member function which works for all sequence containers? > for which I am going to write a proposal as I already announced in this > forum. > Do you want to modify requirements of sequence container with member that does not add any value? -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/. ------=_Part_397_22731323.1382476266583 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In this case we will have different semantics. In my opinion it is= not a good idea. I am sure that append should be introduced only for = sequantial containers that have method push_back as std::basic_string, std:= :vector, std::deque, std::list, and std::x_forward_list

Why not just make non-member function which works for all seq= uence containers?
 
for which I am going to write a proposal as I alre= ady announced in this forum.

Do you w= ant to modify requirements of sequence container with member that does not = add any value?

--
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/<= /a>.
------=_Part_397_22731323.1382476266583-- .