220 7376 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Billy O'Neal" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: To add the method append for all sequential containers that have method push_back Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 20:48:17 -0700 Lines: 128 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: <4167b82e-a3cc-44ce-9825-b52514bc1531@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1133073ae5880104e93829b6 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1382327334 22143 80.91.229.3 (21 Oct 2013 03:48:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 03:48:54 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBDKLBLVE6ADBBKOISKJQKGQEDBDBKBY@isocpp.org Mon Oct 21 05:49:00 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-ie0-f197.google.com ([209.85.223.197]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VY6UF-0005na-4U for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 05:48:59 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-ie0-f197.google.com with SMTP id e14sf17877298iej.4 for ; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 20:48:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=JK1BhiNZnWt+4TZ0pS/sgbEQIkuVunYvEUWEBn46yFo=; b=C6dQFZV79FDAoCxk/6x8ek2w4fSsR4SLp4j+guHqWT/ni+hbZ8BdjD4nCL+O7BuWIg RASTFXvRe8hefsJy0bmXAZwy+BCRVKkBdC28T480VlQzwz/QbGiKlNDVYPXddyzHMY9Z nhWr1ffsVbhtV4O4FwiH9Ma4GXcbNHSm50nWlj+BDaZM8fm3zKYiRJBJY4WlwqEs3VC0 N1LSa/RBXmr0i0uJ4D0usMTIZsFySDawxGT53eih5KOQ0RmoGD6N/DDRCQra1LhnmF1d 5pZwbnkNJNc+k25hQERPTbyjcuGU74ByuLNNoLdDnH3h65brN2Q239JY81L6LaSf1TOF /jww== X-Received: by 10.182.95.68 with SMTP id di4mr5872538obb.4.1382327338100; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 20:48:58 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.182.16.134 with SMTP id g6ls830535obd.98.gmail; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 20:48:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.182.250.163 with SMTP id zd3mr18824769obc.20.1382327337503; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 20:48:57 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from mail-ob0-x22a.google.com (mail-ob0-x22a.google.com [2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22a]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id sy1si9985950obc.116.2013.10.20.20.48.57 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 20 Oct 2013 20:48:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of billy.oneal@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22a as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22a; Original-Received: by mail-ob0-f170.google.com with SMTP id wp18so1943789obc.29 for ; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 20:48:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.60.52.81 with SMTP id r17mr5617441oeo.3.1382327337190; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 20:48:57 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.182.87.37 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 20:48:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4167b82e-a3cc-44ce-9825-b52514bc1531@isocpp.org> X-Original-Sender: billy.oneal@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of billy.oneal@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22a as permitted sender) smtp.mail=billy.oneal@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:7376 Archived-At: --001a1133073ae5880104e93829b6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 Billy O'Neal https://github.com/BillyONeal/ http://stackoverflow.com/users/82320/billy-oneal Malware Response Instructor - BleepingComputer.com On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Vlad from Moscow wrote: > I find out some inconvenience that sequential containers except > std::basic_string that have method push_back at the same time have no > method append. > > For example it would be not bad to write > > std::vector v; > // processing of v > > std::list l; > // processing of l > > v.append( l.begin(), l.end() ); > > Although the same can be done with method insert as for example > > v.insert( v.end(), l.begin(), l.end() ); > > I would prefer to use append because it has more clear semantic and > interchangeable with method the append of std::basic_string. > > I would like to make such a proposal. > > Are any thoughts about adding the method append to sequantial containers? > > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. > To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. > Visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/. > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/. --001a1133073ae5880104e93829b6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+1

=
Billy O'Neal


On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Vlad f= rom Moscow <vlad.moscow@mail.ru> wrote:
I=A0find out=A0some inconvenience that sequential con= tainers except std::basic_string that have method push_back at the same tim= e have no method append.
=A0
For example it would be no= t bad to write
=A0
std::vector<int> v;
// processing of v
=A0
std::list<int> l;
// proc= essing of l
=A0
v.append( l.begin(), l.end() );
=A0
Although the same can be=A0done with method insert as for exa= mple
=A0
v.insert( v.end(), l.begin(), l.end() );
=
=A0
I would prefer to use append because it has more clear s= emantic and interchangeable with method the append of std::basic_string.
=A0
I would like to make such a proposal.
=A0
Are any thoughts about adding the method append=A0to sequantial conta= iners?

--
=A0
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/gro= up/std-proposals/.

--
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/<= /a>.
--001a1133073ae5880104e93829b6-- .