220 7239 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=E9my_Lefevre?= Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Re: "count_while" and "count_until" algorithms Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 22:59:58 +0200 Lines: 121 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b6251b0699eb004e8552dbc X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1381352437 26458 80.91.229.3 (9 Oct 2013 21:00:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 21:00:37 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBCN7B34JVEARB54H26JAKGQEY3YWG7Q@isocpp.org Wed Oct 09 23:00:42 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-wi0-f198.google.com ([209.85.212.198]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VU0s5-0008Pv-2i for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 23:00:41 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-wi0-f198.google.com with SMTP id hq15sf2040503wib.5 for ; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 14:00:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=7THYZhCGp3D3cidTX737Nj/ML4tN2SCYCdyaGSdhKK4=; b=W1e9vldpPlgOSa+Dq+2A0W1Ilg4a2MAoC0ubbXzFfOGx59IFQOF5pVydvHeV9eLwve mgd1dmYTAo+iXqNwmvNIS2J52eiIwlc2XSLV8K2PFHoJjBmqbgIgLJN8PI85gwxBy/92 926yG64EYlDGTgcxe7vbkqXbFazKbxUp+JHOA1S5gednjd1gs9U2Co83zb5lhIRTEy/J ytECd9kgCfrD3HGPh8kO4GlvZLX2e/DiTaF4vM9gho8Qnhu1805GUH5wKC/PxpoYcWyq P8Z3bxJ5lw2MkmZUvSaAxbFkhg824cHV6gBocK63F6w9n8Xarka8b8AxfhH5P/FqhBOz BH0w== X-Received: by 10.112.169.101 with SMTP id ad5mr3395432lbc.1.1381352439994; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 14:00:39 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.180.109.133 with SMTP id hs5ls1556319wib.25.canary; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 14:00:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.93.166 with SMTP id cv6mr4425716wib.37.1381352438713; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 14:00:38 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from mail-we0-x22d.google.com (mail-we0-x22d.google.com [2a00:1450:400c:c03::22d]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i10si16984466wjz.102.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 09 Oct 2013 14:00:38 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lefevreremy@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c03::22d as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c03::22d; Original-Received: by mail-we0-f173.google.com with SMTP id u57so1523288wes.32 for ; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 14:00:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.160.240 with SMTP id xn16mr4438718wib.62.1381352438601; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 14:00:38 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.194.192.33 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 13:59:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: lefevreremy@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lefevreremy@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c03::22d as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lefevreremy@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:7239 Archived-At: --047d7b6251b0699eb004e8552dbc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yes, it's maybe a (the) solution. 2013/10/9 Greg Marr > On Tuesday, October 8, 2013 4:04:23 PM UTC-4, R=E9my Lefevre wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I thought about two new algorithms, that could be named "count_while" an= d >> "count_until". Here are their behavior: >> >> What do you think about adding these two components to the algorithms >> library ? >> > > Should there be both count_while that takes a T to compare to, and > count_while_if that takes a predicate? That seems like it would fulfill > Vlad's desire to have the word _if in there to indicate that it take a > predicate? > > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/d/topic/std-proposals/bXrQrkBw59c/= unsubscribe > . > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. > To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. > Visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/. > --=20 ---=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposa= ls/. --047d7b6251b0699eb004e8552dbc Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Yes, it's maybe a (the) solution.


2013/10/9 Greg Marr <gregmmarr@gmail.com>
On Tuesday, October 8, 2013 4:04:23 PM UTC-4, R=E9my = Lefevre wrote:
Hi,

I thought about two new algorithms, that could be named = "count_while" and "count_until". Here are their behavio= r:

What do you think about adding these two compon= ents to the algorithms library ?

Should there be both count_while that takes a T to compare to, and count_= while_if that takes a predicate? =A0That seems like it would fulfill Vlad&#= 39;s desire to have the word _if in there to indicate that it take a predic= ate?

--
=A0
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Goog= le Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/d/topic/std-proposals/bXrQrkBw59c= /unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to std-pr= oposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/gro= up/std-proposals/.

--
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/<= /a>.
--047d7b6251b0699eb004e8552dbc-- .