220 7204 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Daniel_Kr=FCgler?= Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Re: "count_while" and "count_until" algorithms Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 01:02:46 +0200 Lines: 46 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: <2602b3fd-fccd-459b-be1a-93a12005dc5c@isocpp.org> <231e6ef1-599d-4877-be6c-55e85e5a4e41@isocpp.org> <6e15fc38-8be3-4e74-ade9-e25a8d0e0509@isocpp.org> <2a52a3ad-4fe6-4f77-870c-2a26c2e10e52@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1381273367 31161 80.91.229.3 (8 Oct 2013 23:02:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 23:02:47 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBCT7RVFA4QORBF462KJAKGQELDZV6QQ@isocpp.org Wed Oct 09 01:02:52 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-wi0-f200.google.com ([209.85.212.200]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VTgIi-00059m-EI for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 01:02:48 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-wi0-f200.google.com with SMTP id hn9sf3182wib.7 for ; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 16:02:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=7UH6Xth4urbKxhnGbnvV9mLhv0qrp0HTJUCaP0OCPcI=; b=gpriaz68R9iPLc1c5giThSz2p9pn+xOztcGVi7eeHaHHpNzIcJMF83te9mY+jPAgLV DKJRthcgYBSrLlSC66lktulnXkJeRAirP2TULSnKxKL02EIB87j4HEhXPaheN/nI6kb7 uLLUCdnO4RoUfk4C6rw9mZrFrpJ63ZxIZHz9vSeI2fvaEun2v/t368VXQOH7v0LeRAZ2 pOshHBqRKOoSQtHzJND32QwNnl5H1Hv4fSc3aFPzD5wpNMeNbZJh/TP0Y8f6iMFq6CZu nELcbyyF8Dkyiee5DWfPpaJG2Vx+tIc/Z2cY7TxGNNvznFkdfTF90wTsRDnlgJyKpMi0 VoBg== X-Received: by 10.180.24.105 with SMTP id t9mr28972wif.5.1381273368017; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 16:02:48 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.180.92.67 with SMTP id ck3ls280760wib.10.gmail; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 16:02:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.189.132 with SMTP id gi4mr26016948wic.19.1381273366688; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 16:02:46 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from mail-wg0-x22c.google.com (mail-wg0-x22c.google.com [2a00:1450:400c:c00::22c]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x4si14732645wjf.112.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 08 Oct 2013 16:02:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of daniel.kruegler@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c00::22c as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c00::22c; Original-Received: by mail-wg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id n12so1084wgh.23 for ; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 16:02:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.36.36 with SMTP id n4mr3731452wij.62.1381273366600; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 16:02:46 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.216.153.8 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 16:02:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: daniel.kruegler@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of daniel.kruegler@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c00::22c as permitted sender) smtp.mail=daniel.kruegler@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:7204 Archived-At: 2013/10/9 Evgeny Panasyuk : > 9 oct 2013 =D0=B3., 1:17:17 UTC+4 Daniel Kr=C3=BCgler : >> >> 2013/10/8 Evgeny Panasyuk : >> > 9 oct 2013 =D0=B3., 1:00:37 UTC+4 Daniel Kr=C3=BCgler: >> >> See also >> >> http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-active.html#2242 >> >> for another miss of useful information. >> >> Unfortunately, >> >> http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-closed.html#1313 >> >> was declared NAD. I think I will re-raise it soon. >> > >> > That is unfortunate. But I am not sure how it can be fixed. New >> > algorithm or >> > breaking change? >> >> I think the chances are good that the return type will be changed. We >> did so in similar cases, such as in >> >> http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#488 >> http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#865 > > These are a bit different case - originally they had void return type, an= d > it is easy to change void to something. > But in case of std::copy_n - it already has some return type, and change = of > that type would be breaking change. Nonetheless it was a breaking change, because you can take pointers to instantiations of free library function templates. I agree that the chances are smaller that this was a problem for someone. - Daniel --=20 ---=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposa= ls/. .