220 7196 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Daniel_Kr=FCgler?= Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Re: "count_while" and "count_until" algorithms Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 23:17:17 +0200 Lines: 42 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: <2602b3fd-fccd-459b-be1a-93a12005dc5c@isocpp.org> <231e6ef1-599d-4877-be6c-55e85e5a4e41@isocpp.org> <6e15fc38-8be3-4e74-ade9-e25a8d0e0509@isocpp.org> <2a52a3ad-4fe6-4f77-870c-2a26c2e10e52@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1381267037 28871 80.91.229.3 (8 Oct 2013 21:17:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 21:17:17 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBCT7RVFA4QORBX7M2GJAKGQE6SYK7SY@isocpp.org Tue Oct 08 23:17:21 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-wg0-f69.google.com ([74.125.82.69]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VTeee-0001mL-Di for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 23:17:20 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-wg0-f69.google.com with SMTP id f12sf653907wgh.0 for ; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 14:17:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=b929LQshPH17ZP0m1cheLdzTD2k0W/ftP4tdfXEXuHY=; b=RqKB6baNeuPGTAmfTfC2WGb+YJUdm/WaUc4er6kzENILBBRSvYqrhwTFncZzlgfR4r 3X1as1yZ1177Oibdralv6p8H80fFyL0Dq+QtKhhvbALJ091RiXlAV9I9YDURILrwim8C vk2JjNmuP3xZsxiYMGpfQhR8SnWKaOr+fq5wSzp1ubG503n1j3DqYQDP+ifEQgh/fw3B 6DhjK2nm3YnKrmTn4YeYn9hf8P6JxI4uakRnpQ3BOc0MXbEkuF0JvMboFYDZ/K2WI7dO saDSdybShbGjhmShS+rsyDJo/VD+S2RZdJZLZcm//FC6ri9ySDpm3m94rJPjNLHdfSn3 Xw8w== X-Received: by 10.180.212.76 with SMTP id ni12mr11824913wic.1.1381267039812; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 14:17:19 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.180.21.242 with SMTP id y18ls275679wie.36.gmail; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 14:17:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.19.5 with SMTP id a5mr3627404wje.48.1381267038409; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 14:17:18 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from mail-wg0-x22c.google.com (mail-wg0-x22c.google.com [2a00:1450:400c:c00::22c]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id di3si2111634wib.42.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 08 Oct 2013 14:17:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of daniel.kruegler@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c00::22c as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c00::22c; Original-Received: by mail-wg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id n12so535968wgh.23 for ; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 14:17:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.109.132 with SMTP id hs4mr25621967wib.46.1381267037985; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 14:17:17 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.216.153.8 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 14:17:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: daniel.kruegler@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of daniel.kruegler@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c00::22c as permitted sender) smtp.mail=daniel.kruegler@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:7196 Archived-At: 2013/10/8 Evgeny Panasyuk : > 9 oct 2013 =D0=B3., 1:00:37 UTC+4 Daniel Kr=C3=BCgler: >> See also >> http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-active.html#2242 >> for another miss of useful information. >> Unfortunately, >> http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-closed.html#1313 >> was declared NAD. I think I will re-raise it soon. > > That is unfortunate. But I am not sure how it can be fixed. New algorithm= or > breaking change? I think the chances are good that the return type will be changed. We did so in similar cases, such as in http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#488 http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#865 > I remember that Alexander Stepanov mentioned that issue in "Efficient > Programming with Components". > He said something like: "First they throw away counted ranges for C++98. = In > C++11 they tried to return something, but did it wrong." (maybe I will f= ind > link a bit later). ;-) - Daniel --=20 ---=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposa= ls/. .