220 7181 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nevin Liber Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Re: "count_while" and "count_until" algorithms Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 15:50:34 -0500 Lines: 74 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: <2602b3fd-fccd-459b-be1a-93a12005dc5c@isocpp.org> <231e6ef1-599d-4877-be6c-55e85e5a4e41@isocpp.org> <6e15fc38-8be3-4e74-ade9-e25a8d0e0509@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11337468f9be1f04e840ed73 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1381265474 11454 80.91.229.3 (8 Oct 2013 20:51:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 20:51:14 +0000 (UTC) To: "std-proposals@isocpp.org" Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBCE35H5S6IDBBQ7A2GJAKGQEMAOA7GA@isocpp.org Tue Oct 08 22:51:18 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-vb0-f69.google.com ([209.85.212.69]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VTeFQ-0004fS-DO for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 22:51:16 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-vb0-f69.google.com with SMTP id e13sf17666248vbg.8 for ; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 13:51:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=B5qAiGzp3AjkZiLSs0/p1uB9TlDj7zrCVT5HG1C2P+k=; b=FSWJ+E9D/t5W0cBJHHQhDBtmjCub4IxO6JQfv02p7e62JOe+c7kEBcy5CD8yjs/xbX FzH7LR2TZEngMSgNFh5fX7DJTHdmn62asGQZga6hdxaUfk7qbh9h14xFqHthXGjLAPgp MkIG8O+Q6UccmKxIQGnC7fO2v7NLorWJRRZmhAhExVLeo3JT/Pe+cE43C/KTVWE7lxl2 HItEIGIkGJcmNdyykvdcraBDP8fixK5krB1FS3rAdj9lRenZQ3KSDwXoEnjXBgaL3tMm kRMf/+dMzhUxpvSB97tdrTVXc7gFz/OAQIbzG4HYzuldvgShSppcpJW9eTU6x2LVISug pZNw== X-Received: by 10.236.51.170 with SMTP id b30mr3550794yhc.45.1381265475513; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 13:51:15 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.49.35.133 with SMTP id h5ls455535qej.54.gmail; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 13:51:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.49.83.40 with SMTP id n8mr4962445qey.88.1381265475064; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 13:51:15 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from mail-qc0-x229.google.com (mail-qc0-x229.google.com [2607:f8b0:400d:c01::229]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l4si7137021qcz.64.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 08 Oct 2013 13:51:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nliber@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c01::229 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400d:c01::229; Original-Received: by mail-qc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id c9so6541241qcz.28 for ; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 13:51:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.229.213.1 with SMTP id gu1mr4978346qcb.13.1381265474946; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 13:51:14 -0700 (PDT) Original-Sender: nliber@gmail.com Original-Received: by 10.49.60.70 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 13:50:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: nevin@eviloverlord.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of nliber@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c01::229 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=nliber@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:7181 Archived-At: --001a11337468f9be1f04e840ed73 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 8 October 2013 15:44, Daniel Kr=FCgler wrote= : > 2013/10/8 : > > @Evgeny: Yes, I see the advantage to return both count and iterator, bu= t > I > > didn't find an elegant way to do it for the moment. > > Traditionally a std::pair is used for this. > While true, I really rather we get away from doing so, as "iterator" and "count" are far better field names than "first" and "second". --=20 Nevin ":-)" Liber (847) 691-1404 --=20 ---=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposa= ls/. --001a11337468f9be1f04e840ed73 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 8 October 2013 15:44, Daniel Kr=FCgler <daniel= ..kruegler@gmail.com> wrote:
2013/10/8 =A0<lefevreremy@gmail.com>:
> @Evgeny: Yes, I see the advantage to return both cou= nt and iterator, but I
> didn't find an elegant way to do it for the moment.

Traditionally a std::pair<A, B> is used for this.

While true, I really rather we get away from doing s= o, as "iterator" and "count" are far better field names= than "first" and "second".
--
=A0Nevin ":-)" Liber=A0 <mailto:nevin@eviloverlord.com= >=A0 (847) 691-1404

--
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/<= /a>.
--001a11337468f9be1f04e840ed73-- .