220 7128 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ville Voutilainen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Named arguments proposal Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 16:29:37 +0300 Lines: 103 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: <74166da9-20f4-49b0-a9e6-47bf5be92e35@isocpp.org> <6ba6b273-76df-4037-9851-4a2ab98f0b68@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c35c289d2f3804e83ac2bb X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1381238977 11055 80.91.229.3 (8 Oct 2013 13:29:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 13:29:37 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBC5JHI7A7ALRBQUR2CJAKGQE7VKYFIA@isocpp.org Tue Oct 08 15:29:39 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-qe0-f72.google.com ([209.85.128.72]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VTXM3-0004W5-Ft for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 15:29:39 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-qe0-f72.google.com with SMTP id 1sf10960356qee.7 for ; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 06:29:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=spcxtenpdA/AGnUmhapIt8hJKWa2dbPwO7vcN3RFjKo=; b=AYec07P44kqPFtsrYZ+T/eKFqQMw8gtdg6jcUenwoUR033yM+cv9fPeX7pNv7SGtJP x57S3j8QfJegW5g38R2sdiWK17jYy68vmE5ayXbLpviN60TtTJgN6Sod12ytAye2mQJR uhol63i1HTAL5uECdpOaeBRoT86R/WUu5ehzbJ9uLbACEymPt0d+MC4563F8MwitAZNi xwjp2vBypuCsN1U818ooO5MYTIKTPJeOi/Ht/2IPwK2hm26rEzle0ZaF9QwsrerZ7kt5 V+hez4uV2fEKcw0dWsayvoDJDX/QzKpC2xaBAuj6lRUKcO6bttGg5Md/p6NudklPWzVd 1iYw== X-Received: by 10.236.145.34 with SMTP id o22mr1500822yhj.22.1381238978521; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 06:29:38 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.49.116.135 with SMTP id jw7ls217590qeb.58.gmail; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 06:29:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.49.3.3 with SMTP id 3mr2089806qey.56.1381238977884; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 06:29:37 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from mail-qe0-x22b.google.com (mail-qe0-x22b.google.com [2607:f8b0:400d:c02::22b]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q10si15620852qab.111.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 08 Oct 2013 06:29:37 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ville.voutilainen@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c02::22b as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400d:c02::22b; Original-Received: by mail-qe0-f43.google.com with SMTP id nc12so1589368qeb.30 for ; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 06:29:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.224.45.136 with SMTP id e8mr1189825qaf.123.1381238977661; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 06:29:37 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.224.76.135 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 06:29:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: ville.voutilainen@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ville.voutilainen@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c02::22b as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ville.voutilainen@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:7128 Archived-At: --001a11c35c289d2f3804e83ac2bb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 8 October 2013 16:14, Diego S=E1nchez wrote: > > > > A final note about the syntax. I like the use of the colon in the functio= n > declaration, that turns the argument name into a label; but on function > calls I would prefer the equal sign; it makes the purpose clearer: > > write_datagram(buf, size, is_reliable: true); > > vs > > write_datagram(buf, size, is_reliable=3Dtrue); > > > > 'fraid we can't have that. This is already valid: void f(bool x) {} int main() { bool x=3Dfalse; f(x=3Dtrue); } --=20 ---=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposa= ls/. --001a11c35c289d2f3804e83ac2bb Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



On 8 October 2013 16:14, Diego S=E1nchez <dsde71@gmail.com><= /span> wrote:



A final note about the syntax. I like the us= e of the colon in the function declaration, that turns the argument name in= to a label; but on function calls I would prefer the equal sign; it makes t= he purpose clearer:

write_datagram(buf, size, is=
_reliable: true);
vs
write_datagram(buf, size, is=
_reliable=3Dtrue);


=

'fraid we can't = have that. This is already valid:

void f(bool x) {}
int main() <= br> {
=A0=A0=A0 bool x=3Dfalse;
=A0=A0=A0 f(x=3Dtrue);
}

--
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/<= /a>.
--001a11c35c289d2f3804e83ac2bb-- .