220 6397 <01a2435f-237e-4eed-a595-a7f46bdd0e4e@isocpp.org> article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Vlad from Moscow Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: array_ref - light-weight array Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 12:01:07 -0700 (PDT) Lines: 84 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: <01a2435f-237e-4eed-a595-a7f46bdd0e4e@isocpp.org> References: <455810e6-0227-4026-a173-4b4a3edb5c72@isocpp.org> <849ad9a5-a2d9-4053-9beb-80c4b19ab982@isocpp.org> <94c4ec6f-1ca1-4926-8363-d6b4d999947a@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_4368_11580694.1378926067729" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1378926068 21667 80.91.229.3 (11 Sep 2013 19:01:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 19:01:08 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBCXLLRHD7IDRB5H3YKIQKGQELBSJSSQ@isocpp.org Wed Sep 11 21:01:12 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-vb0-f69.google.com ([209.85.212.69]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VJpf3-00045e-Tz for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 21:01:10 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-vb0-f69.google.com with SMTP id e13sf10738432vbg.8 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 12:01:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=ZTwHKDxqRYwQa3tPplJ0WGBDJzv20EqPErDaYUyFtQo=; b=XRrksCZXFX4hngovZXhwV5vereDIa1UeCQYVieRyekew0wpqmRymoGrBTZ9ucvX/56 8YXv8cKv0GE1I8BiSMru/wr9rg6QLouFOyD9H07zHaB5mU1IXtXe9EtZ/KbNV+yvfOSW KN6WH0JOmYQrTDH9v2pjtSe8tOUk4G14nR5b2n+bDi2HQTfORJ4i8N7eQIA4HFOu7b0+ b1IWhF66iBq326e0sxmA1fPLX5ZpcxjKWFOxmV0JsYFHOQUBaMOeQ8gq/232wjhnlNgC Xqfp7JWJjQnDXhAGRVSQ3I5LWOFnJ05hz1IWYu1YPm4T8rotMlRTmwrPNeNb17eAKLnC +0SQ== X-Received: by 10.236.227.165 with SMTP id d35mr1206131yhq.51.1378926068947; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 12:01:08 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.49.3.169 with SMTP id d9ls453332qed.61.gmail; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 12:01:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.49.64.72 with SMTP id m8mr138655qes.20.1378926068301; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 12:01:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: vlad.moscow@mail.ru Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:6397 Archived-At: ------=_Part_4368_11580694.1378926067729 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable At present my head is busy of thinking about the proposal for the two-sided= =20 list.:) =20 =D3=D2=C5=C4=C1, 11 =D3=C5=CE=D4=D1=C2=D2=D1 2013 =C7., 22:41:09 UTC+4 =D0= =CF=CC=D8=DA=CF=D7=C1=D4=C5=CC=D8 Ville Voutilainen=20 =CE=C1=D0=C9=D3=C1=CC:=20 > > On 11 September 2013 21:34, Vlad from Moscow > > wrote: > >> My idea differs. I do not want that array_ref would be immutable. >> =20 >> >> >> > Well, then just consider the previous proposal as a FYI that you need to= =20 > refer to in a new > proposal. You may need to make a stronger case for the need for an=20 > array_ref than > the previous proposal does.=20 > > --=20 ---=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposa= ls/. ------=_Part_4368_11580694.1378926067729 Content-Type: text/html; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
At present my head is busy of thinking about&nbs= p;the proposal for the two-sided list.:)
 

=D3= =D2=C5=C4=C1, 11 =D3=C5=CE=D4=D1=C2=D2=D1 2013 =C7., 22:41:09 UTC+4 = =D0=CF=CC=D8=DA=CF=D7=C1=D4=C5=CC=D8 Ville Voutilainen =CE=C1=D0=C9=D3=C1= =CC: 

On 11 September 2013 21:34, Vlad from Moscow <vlad....@mail.ru> wrote:
My idea differs. I do no= t want that array_ref would be immutable.
 


Well, then just consider the previou= s proposal as a FYI that you need to refer to in a new
proposal. You may= need to make a stronger case for the need for an array_ref than
the previous proposal does.

--
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/<= /a>.
------=_Part_4368_11580694.1378926067729-- .