220 5965 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nick Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Re: Properties Syntax Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 18:42:52 -0700 (PDT) Lines: 71 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: <5e23a0e9-2bd9-4f62-aa83-47bea8144eae@isocpp.org> <5458c2e0-2e03-444e-a34d-4960a07b94ad@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_6261_22378323.1377740572516" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1377740573 3264 80.91.229.3 (29 Aug 2013 01:42:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 01:42:53 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBC42HSUOVYGBBHOO7KIAKGQEJRLC6PY@isocpp.org Thu Aug 29 03:42:56 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-qe0-f69.google.com ([209.85.128.69]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VErGA-0007I3-In for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 03:42:54 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-qe0-f69.google.com with SMTP id 5sf7860311qeb.4 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 18:42:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=greJY6iifyMbY46uMupWsJD2Nk6AMISo4BlmNQ5ZL/I=; b=Aix0NBP+A/RCsZrL+4x2UuRfRPp1mf0TjC3MY13DO2lzvF7GFhRUCHZRWPjG4KQM6J RHg+x+Z2GSzrzgvSJDE/tMFBF5cqP+55k80dR3Hp/+M7aMT8e06uEhIuNZ9sj5xZo1jW IMtesS+lnPxQDNWmn4pkdBEKUsPrOQk8R86fWT4CE5C7A6yY2VvIkJE9cGK1mYlKXhWj G7V/f5n6WmSXEKmUxXOyxJh40tp1FxfLKcilv475O3CVWfvVBdccQQQxNoUlqbb1+6+/ LB4qo0VOC9gHqV2zQ09fTFIfR5BVl0YxVzGViBYVTGQPyCmpH2MUkONrrVWeRjr2jIdg z73w== X-Received: by 10.236.167.138 with SMTP id i10mr356916yhl.9.1377740573626; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 18:42:53 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.49.16.200 with SMTP id i8ls697715qed.65.gmail; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 18:42:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.49.98.162 with SMTP id ej2mr24886qeb.10.1377740573074; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 18:42:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: nicolas.jinchereau@gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:5965 Archived-At: ------=_Part_6261_22378323.1377740572516 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wednesday, 28 August 2013 20:59:49 UTC-4, Ville Voutilainen wrote: > > > > On 29 August 2013 02:04, Nicol Bolas >wrote: > >> >> If properties are syntactically a good and wanted thing, then they >> deserve the dignity of being a proper language feature. And if >> >> > Do people think properties should be a language feature, when they are > seemingly just one of the many > things compile-time reflection can provide? > I keep hearing people try to relate reflection to properties. This doesn't make any sense to me at all. Can you provide a pseudo code example of how a property would be retrieved using a reflection interface? -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/. ------=_Part_6261_22378323.1377740572516 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wednesday, 28 August 2= 013 20:59:49 UTC-4, Ville Voutilainen wrote:



On 29 August 2013 02:04, Nicol Bolas <jmck...@gmail.com> wrote:

If properties are = syntactically a good and wanted thing, then they deserve the dignity of bei= ng a proper language feature. And if


Do people think properties= should be a language feature, when they are seemingly just one of the many=
things compile-time reflection can provide?

I keep hearing people try to relate reflection= to properties. This doesn't make any sense to me at all. Can you provide a= pseudo code example of how a property would be retrieved using a reflectio= n interface?

--
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/<= /a>.
------=_Part_6261_22378323.1377740572516-- .