220 5523 <41053185-b927-494e-bb84-838a5ae4cb6b@isocpp.org> article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steve Heller Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Re: A library to provide a virtual memory vector of strings Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 13:26:05 -0700 (PDT) Lines: 92 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: <41053185-b927-494e-bb84-838a5ae4cb6b@isocpp.org> References: <861959e9-74f3-4ed8-aeca-bad9c3256acd@isocpp.org> <2896e1b4-1e3c-493e-b61b-7c1ae955de46@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_92_22195922.1374611165272" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1374611165 22814 80.91.229.3 (23 Jul 2013 20:26:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 20:26:05 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBDG2H26ZRUARBXONXOHQKGQEPF2PYUQ@isocpp.org Tue Jul 23 22:26:07 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-vb0-f70.google.com ([209.85.212.70]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V1j9r-0001FG-4r for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 22:26:07 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-vb0-f70.google.com with SMTP id w8sf407877vbf.5 for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 13:26:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=TJEJfrIzPedT5YkRXMh/Hu9S+gLSFf7iWGiySSLFSeM=; b=mMk1xzsyZkgIZrymy65tmf36tgUTQjFt0q+en7Q0537NafhI6Apzjrtn+j6kGgmMSO BreR5sGrEuzhf4rma4UfL/SvH7XlBiJgf+3CrCknf3LnsMEyUnFu0gyQ8jacfPimg8JL 7i3nEYmrO6MbyLPv3147VgkogNthIZzYd3ig1WUfqYhn8vYfqFwiS8A9/HsQMEw2+D/G ZU7EEGY4S+E8P12LY9gy1mW8QjBl4byTa9dCGBHLS26HPQ1ZRnEp2G8LETwYuTP1Xzxm aX8CA8VHi9hbwGBe8nSQsLHR1ViQKaIG8Z1SCv8JeMHO19iCrUllXW4twD5BzUDFJCsk 2dFg== X-Received: by 10.236.156.33 with SMTP id l21mr19067843yhk.18.1374611166258; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 13:26:06 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.49.133.102 with SMTP id pb6ls3242877qeb.80.gmail; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 13:26:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.49.4.201 with SMTP id m9mr1365655qem.15.1374611165718; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 13:26:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: technovelist@gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:5523 Archived-At: ------=_Part_92_22195922.1374611165272 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sure, no problem. I appreciate your feedback. On Tuesday, July 23, 2013 3:09:29 PM UTC-5, Ville Voutilainen wrote: > > > > > On 23 July 2013 17:34, Steve Heller >wrote: > >> Well, since this library and its predecessor implementations have been >> around for at least 30 years, I'm pretty sure that the underlying ideas are >> sound. As for the current implementation, it is in use in my current >> employer's products and has been very helpful in reducing memory >> consumption without causing any significant problems. >> >> >> > I haven't disputed whether its sound or not. For some audiences, going via > boost is a big plus. > As I have said repeatedly, that's not a mandatory prerequisite. I fully > understand, for various > reasons that I would not guesstimate-elaborate on, that some people don't > want to > go that way. > > I have no beef for or against going via boost or not. I'm just trying to > give hopefully helpful hints. > It's up to the discretion of every proposal author whether to go via boost > or not. > > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/. ------=_Part_92_22195922.1374611165272 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sure, no problem. I appreciate your feedback. 

On Tuesday, July= 23, 2013 3:09:29 PM UTC-5, Ville Voutilainen wrote:



On 23 July 2013 17:34, Steve Heller <t= echno...@gmail.com> wrote:
Well, since this library and its predecessor= implementations have been around for at least 30 years, I'm pretty sure th= at the underlying ideas are sound. As for the current implementation, it is= in use in my current employer's products and has been very helpful in redu= cing memory consumption without causing any significant problems.



I haven't disputed whether its sou= nd or not. For some audiences, going via boost is a big plus.
As I have said repeatedly, that's not a mandatory prerequisite.  I fu= lly understand, for various
reasons that I would not guesstimate-elaborate on, that some people don't w= ant to
go that way.

I have no beef for or against goi= ng via boost or not. I'm just trying to give hopefully helpful hints.
It's up to the discretion of every proposal author whether to go= via boost or not.

--
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/<= /a>.
 
 
------=_Part_92_22195922.1374611165272-- .