220 5340 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ville Voutilainen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Re: Allowing any integral type as an argument for user defined literal operators Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 20:23:02 +0300 Lines: 81 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: <80016e3a-2dc8-4887-b59b-a8aff20439e0@isocpp.org> <708b8756-972d-46ce-8e66-2be484e9c4cd@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bdc9396f4c6fe04e1034bc4 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1373304182 16803 80.91.229.3 (8 Jul 2013 17:23:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 17:23:02 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBC5JHI7A7ALRB5XK5OHAKGQEHUGNK3Y@isocpp.org Mon Jul 08 19:23:04 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-qc0-f197.google.com ([209.85.216.197]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UwF9T-0003e5-Uf for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 19:23:04 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-qc0-f197.google.com with SMTP id u12sf5756714qcx.4 for ; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 10:23:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-beenthere:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=N+SSRISsvQwHXvS+o4TAmHPFAweYglrU4oz6LajogqU=; b=jNFiifPchU5jxbp8IEWTpLCeoDG5vL6ej9RG/uP/p82scPKBoyH0sfdpvLCrxPgL4j Mkb3buehC0McYQctMM49ZRalmB9yaoNzfstNnAYwyVWw5s8Ny3CnE41RXlxa10hswBap ZfNOiA9hWnGdzp4e2A/zp//mzr5Xdsbbsc1r+pDa0gMYyHCQas6gapgrI2WcZMaOfqg7 1mgYCAxwPy7FGrd07KyB/w1Jw9K6L4KNxKyxfmg9dEY0+n5MqOUcIqjvpHAcqsNzzvyl PAEztfgVmd6qQLHuAsSOqMfEYAjVo+ITQ1AyF9WIG4vwNJSF545Nd6LW/R2ry3afzFFB CV+Q== X-Received: by 10.236.93.113 with SMTP id k77mr11902034yhf.25.1373304183057; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 10:23:03 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.49.39.201 with SMTP id r9ls1938847qek.72.gmail; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 10:23:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.49.34.195 with SMTP id b3mr16898886qej.40.1373304182429; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 10:23:02 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from mail-qe0-x235.google.com (mail-qe0-x235.google.com [2607:f8b0:400d:c02::235]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ox8si6106260qeb.10.2013.07.08.10.23.02 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Jul 2013 10:23:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ville.voutilainen@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c02::235 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400d:c02::235; Original-Received: by mail-qe0-f53.google.com with SMTP id 1so2438428qee.26 for ; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 10:23:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.49.16.197 with SMTP id i5mr16757846qed.58.1373304182304; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 10:23:02 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.224.52.71 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 10:23:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <708b8756-972d-46ce-8e66-2be484e9c4cd@isocpp.org> X-Original-Sender: ville.voutilainen@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ville.voutilainen@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c02::235 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ville.voutilainen@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:5340 Archived-At: --047d7bdc9396f4c6fe04e1034bc4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 8 July 2013 14:35, wrote: > On Saturday, July 6, 2013 10:26:19 PM UTC+2, Micha=C5=82 Dominiak wrote: >> >> Today I came across a very silly issue: you cannot do `uint64_t >> operator""_foo(uint64_t)`, because `uint64_t` is a typedef for `unsigned >> long`, not `unsigned long long` on both Clang and GCC on Linux (despite = the >> fact that `sizeof(unsigned long) =3D=3D sizeof(unsigned long long)`). Yo= u have >> to type the long type name, just because the typedef isn't for the exact >> type required by the standard. I hope we all agree this is a silly >> situation. > > > I wasn't aware the standard required uint64_t to be typedef'ed to unsigne= d > long long int. I wasn't even aware the standard > It's not required to be unsigned long long. --=20 ---=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposa= ls/. --047d7bdc9396f4c6fe04e1034bc4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



On 8 July 2013 14:35, <jalobado@gmail.com> wrote:<= br>
On Saturday, July 6, 2013 10:26:19 PM UTC+2, Micha=C5=82 = Dominiak wrote:
Today I came across = a very silly issue: you cannot do `uint64_t operator""_foo(uint64= _t)`, because `uint64_t` is a typedef for `unsigned long`, not `unsigned lo= ng long` on both Clang and GCC on Linux (despite the fact that `sizeof(unsi= gned long) =3D=3D sizeof(unsigned long long)`). You have to type the long t= ype name, just because the typedef isn't for the exact type required by= the standard. I hope we all agree this is a silly situation.

I wasn't aware the standard required uint64_t= to be typedef'ed to unsigned long long int. I wasn't even aware th= e standard

It's not required to = be unsigned long long.


--
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/<= /a>.
 
 
--047d7bdc9396f4c6fe04e1034bc4-- .