220 5266 <1a1fd94c-eb51-4ff4-8e3d-7781a6c9b925@isocpp.org> article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: asaelr@gmail.com Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Some thoughts about coroutines Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 18:10:04 -0700 (PDT) Lines: 50 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: <1a1fd94c-eb51-4ff4-8e3d-7781a6c9b925@isocpp.org> References: <291db835-d42d-40cd-8760-47cdf327680d@isocpp.org> <7d8a2d85-0995-4833-ad0c-75577f293b63@isocpp.org> <2c77506f-433f-43b7-871f-e429c4b295bf@isocpp.org> <3e94ef89-4ea8-4549-827f-94dd7a32b9fa@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_86_19872990.1372381804311" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1372381808 20773 80.91.229.3 (28 Jun 2013 01:10:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 01:10:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: asaelr@gmail.com, asaelr@gmail.com, asaelr@gmail.com To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBCB23LHRZUKRB3GEWOHAKGQE5TNVZGA@isocpp.org Fri Jun 28 03:10:09 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-vb0-f71.google.com ([209.85.212.71]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UsNCQ-0007o7-V1 for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 03:10:07 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-vb0-f71.google.com with SMTP id f12sf2066665vbg.10 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 18:10:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence :mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=9BmFljBp9QAHMxnG3o7T2TNIdwF5WnNDTXGtNlheFLA=; b=pWgCS8u6TZk1sr4tD+AtE2GctvIG6gQn94Tc2LDPZPtqv95kjG/nmUCPzX1KOwJw9B PSSB/GdTfyxsNy/RsVvz6/W46hIVF3+1HDFHRHQ64RtkD01JcVNy1WExVNJER0X/dns+ UaSOEA2wJF5cIVjBefaamRLQcYg98zvqhRZW2RsIYeGUEqwJHz9KAegrc5cBQXNpSBlo 7Clod3neEfRFKCfcw5DlDOLPO8tTDDuVdhkq6HPDUPmry5gvQ2CmdVTYwxMURV+sMz4Y a3h6OL9KKjouayPEHomRSUac4Nx2FZ9IqXxWr3rU3TWhYuAaOUBXzi/FVf51PQDCGuo/ 2QSw== X-Received: by 10.236.150.82 with SMTP id y58mr6493947yhj.5.1372381805926; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 18:10:05 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.49.108.74 with SMTP id hi10ls1171978qeb.50.gmail; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 18:10:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.49.4.104 with SMTP id j8mr298478qej.40.1372381804708; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 18:10:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3e94ef89-4ea8-4549-827f-94dd7a32b9fa@isocpp.org> X-Original-Sender: asaelr@gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:5266 Archived-At: ------=_Part_86_19872990.1372381804311 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Another thing - what should *operator()* return when the coroutine is done? We can't know it's done before the internal function actually ends, so we can't just check *isdone() *(or, maybe, *operator bool()* ) to know if we shouldn't call *operator()*. (One solution is to let the coroutine not to return control just when yielding, but instead continue running until just before the next *return*statement, but I think it's kind of evil) -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/. ------=_Part_86_19872990.1372381804311 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Another thing - what should operator() return when the coroutine is = done? We can't know it's done before the internal function actually ends, s= o we can't just check isdone() (or, maybe, operator bool() ) = to know if we shouldn't call operator().
(One solution is to let = the coroutine not to return control just when yielding, but instead continu= e running until just before the next return statement, but I think i= t's kind of evil)

--
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/<= /a>.
 
 
------=_Part_86_19872990.1372381804311-- .