220 5107 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jonathan Wakely Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: constexpr data member Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:12:43 -0700 (PDT) Lines: 85 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: <300a19dd-8a82-4788-9802-45170480b30a@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3436_8026110.1371658363624" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1371658365 4279 80.91.229.3 (19 Jun 2013 16:12:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:12:45 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBCMONUNYS4IRB7FQQ6HAKGQE22PHQYI@isocpp.org Wed Jun 19 18:12:46 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-ie0-f200.google.com ([209.85.223.200]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UpL01-0005tA-Kh for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:12:45 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-ie0-f200.google.com with SMTP id x12sf25820118ief.3 for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:12:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=NWhoMM39btQTo+1CD+B56v3zwi2qaWgVRhu+voDNqkc=; b=dSXHnNDAgLv9shrVHjKPhvAc8/JlrnJu+ipMBgWPBRaQbdfTQS9PuTuqA89T/xMgUJ vdDfqy4tQPVTY4r2qQrDUKaMNA9cA4TgdCHs5vkzcuh3wfvCFWU4HJgFlX+YdfANXLTz vUec/BcWxYwIX+OMOwDDvM47Zy9Yite0iO9FViIz7Zu3+gSGRaIPeQtvROcC/Jw+KqXC S8fpgw1HAEmA1obIMTv+r3qpV4SyAB0gi1RqcT+87LAopyO58zoN5KjiZHaxeauMhFg6 6BaDLZDYFU7uDn+yWI/YWH+evW1to5jLi0E+YIAwLVjhwVXA3V0NsOPk8aS8nEJuzmLQ 7MyQ== X-Received: by 10.182.72.196 with SMTP id f4mr476426obv.23.1371658364588; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:12:44 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.182.115.202 with SMTP id jq10ls58502obb.72.gmail; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:12:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.182.19.163 with SMTP id g3mr7426obe.1.1371658364049; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:12:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: cxx@kayari.org Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:5107 Archived-At: ------=_Part_3436_8026110.1371658363624 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 4:46:32 PM UTC+1, Zhihao Yuan wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Daniel Kr=FCgler=20 > > wrote:=20 > >> Maybe we can allow it to appear in=20 > >> a local class :) LOL=20 > >=20 > > And this extension becomes a potential problem when we should consider= =20 > > to allow static members for local classes.=20 > > If there is a plan to allow static member in a local class,=20 > there is still no difference between `constexpr` data members=20 > which are declared as static or not, right? What's the=20 > problem?=20 > > =20 Programming language design should be more rational than just "I don't=20 like this, can we change it?" =20 --=20 ---=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposa= ls/. ------=_Part_3436_8026110.1371658363624 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 4:46:32 PM UTC+1, Zhihao Yuan wrote:On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:29 AM,= Daniel Kr=FCgler
<daniel....@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Maybe we can allow it to appear in
>> a local class :) LOL
>
> And this extension becomes a potential problem when we should cons= ider
> to allow static members for local classes.

If there is a plan to allow static member in a local class,
there is still no difference between `constexpr` data members
which are declared as static or not, right?  What's the
problem?

 
 Programming language desig= n should be more rational than just "I don't like this, can we change it?"<= br>

 

--
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/<= /a>.
 
 
------=_Part_3436_8026110.1371658363624-- .