220 4941 <51B232F5.70905@wanadoo.fr> article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Vicente J. Botet Escriba" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: N3558 :A standardized representation of Asynchronous operation Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 21:22:29 +0200 Lines: 42 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: <51B232F5.70905@wanadoo.fr> References: <519F9E48.7050700@wanadoo.fr> <51A0B7C3.40109@wanadoo.fr> <51A6EFE6.4030407@wanadoo.fr> <51A7039F.20007@gmail.com> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1370632965 1677 80.91.229.3 (7 Jun 2013 19:22:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 19:22:45 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBDH67CONY4PBB5XFZCGQKGQECFDXSNI@isocpp.org Fri Jun 07 21:22:42 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-wg0-f69.google.com ([74.125.82.69]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ul2F5-0001AA-W9 for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 21:22:32 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-wg0-f69.google.com with SMTP id j13sf4190370wgh.4 for ; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 12:22:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-beenthere:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=dox2TDhvxwBqX+L4Ue/3Zn9ZAIsnhRll+YGAMc3kQ0I=; b=a3a+0JlcPIA3Ejv5ILJrsgJGR4DUekJGG5W3nRZn/cylt69ExCA1QcghquCyASQyPw TJ7BHf6TSqKODwl+ZMxO6DhovoporBbjyXdbmnyIY9y2UbN3uiGyfNIDJFo7+HPnEy74 4VzyHVKEQMVwKyIjrZJO4YGBIoNPCY09VUJFI/j0WAS2JGox2IqPd24C+RU1KoGAPIqQ A5pYNRbIZ9U7lWCiuEE6g6Kx5BIfsoB/9ayEap0h/rixfMEyKFRKspwfS3YobfjLXC/m /levnUfU/I1FGTaPlWdLhRo+BpKEwiWDJS3dFIiKShB+PtgVLaxB6LPzuKq X-Received: by 10.180.185.115 with SMTP id fb19mr1722092wic.0.1370632951217; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 12:22:31 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.180.104.36 with SMTP id gb4ls329842wib.46.canary; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 12:22:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.11.72 with SMTP id o8mr135418wjb.0.1370632950280; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 12:22:30 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from smtp.smtpout.orange.fr (smtp04.smtpout.orange.fr. [80.12.242.126]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r7si59806wje.81.2013.06.07.12.22.30 for ; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 12:22:30 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 80.12.242.126 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of vicente.botet@wanadoo.fr) client-ip=80.12.242.126; Original-Received: from pc4.home ([2.13.5.156]) by mwinf5d60 with ME id lXNV1l00Y3MyQeS03XNVhh; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 21:22:30 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 In-Reply-To: <51A7039F.20007@gmail.com> X-Original-Sender: vicente.botet@wanadoo.fr X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 80.12.242.126 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of vicente.botet@wanadoo.fr) smtp.mail=vicente.botet@wanadoo.fr Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:4941 Archived-At: Le 30/05/13 09:45, Anthony Williams a =E9crit : > On 30/05/13 07:21, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote: >> Le 25/05/13 15:08, Vicente J. Botet Escriba a =E9crit : >>> Le 24/05/13 19:07, Vicente J. Botet Escriba a =E9crit : >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> What is the rationale for when_all to return >>>> future>> instead of future>? >>>> What is the rationale for when_any to return >>>> future>> instead of future> ? >>>> >>>> >>> I have one more question about when_any. What would be the expected >>> behavior when when_any has parameters that shared the same shared >>> state, as in >>> >>> std::shared_future fi1 =3D >>> std::async(calculate_the_answer_to_life_the_universe_and_everything).sh= are(); >>> std::shared_future fi2 =3D fi1; >>> std::when_any(fi1, fi2).wait(); >>> > This will wait until the async finishes. Both futures become ready > together, so there is no problem here. > Any other point of view? Vicente --=20 ---=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposa= ls/?hl=3Den. .