220 4721 <CAGg_6+O_XjW4e_yci=VmVY1Af9vGH=2W-meFfj2gb7aa7KEk1A@mail.gmail.com> article
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Nevin Liber <nevin@eviloverlord.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals
Subject: Re: Remove vector<bool>?
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 15:17:25 -0500
Lines: 108
Approved: news@gmane.org
Message-ID: <CAGg_6+O_XjW4e_yci=VmVY1Af9vGH=2W-meFfj2gb7aa7KEk1A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGsORuDQdeWAO5yjA6=h0hW9Y0Sj4F1gcHB61udw5JFmtx+g4Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <83a68179-f8cd-42e9-a880-2bd797b30c28@isocpp.org> <CAGg_6+NDacUk23QRd5PTNKG5XYHaw9e18r4COD-6SzQM9vTZbg@mail.gmail.com>
 <a077c61e-bf59-4d4d-8aa4-b6a810e47595@isocpp.org> <CAGsORuAQGpB5UxBr+GetOLxyPpBs93MEsZNV4RGk-o_c-_buvg@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3010ede756e00904dde114cb
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1369858687 26400 80.91.229.3 (29 May 2013 20:18:07 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 20:18:07 +0000 (UTC)
To: std-proposals@isocpp.org
Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBCE35H5S6IDBB7WETGGQKGQE62VNLTI@isocpp.org Wed May 29 22:18:08 2013
Return-path: <std-proposals+bncBCE35H5S6IDBB7WETGGQKGQE62VNLTI@isocpp.org>
Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mail-gg0-f200.google.com ([209.85.161.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <std-proposals+bncBCE35H5S6IDBB7WETGGQKGQE62VNLTI@isocpp.org>)
	id 1Uhmox-0004cz-Ky
	for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 May 2013 22:18:07 +0200
Original-Received: by mail-gg0-f200.google.com with SMTP id w6sf10181485ggk.3
        for <gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org>; Wed, 29 May 2013 13:18:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=x-beenthere:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=Hggb4pgeLXgplh6qeAN+ocqkGjw8FWoNgIDB4YjPP5k=;
        b=wNihspiGcfoExibPqB9JA4KVBI9Kx8J+rvPGFZO4E8cmLHFBaGtmGTxTWTUTTGPNoc
         EQcIKy1/6kl2QBINn5urzoOmL8rnslbDAxfwiY4NSQjNemLotfhMwhBAFNrCNxbo0ncm
         XtLdJTgmmofACmXIsh32Sntc+v1h1sDvIIxHDIXsh/eq7h+LbO4Hx8XNPEFFRDziaGpo
         lqWGKAREAioL3sEOq62mpnEpLMmNoL/TT9LEYURzxt92n+1l6cA946Txvg/VZccBQNE3
         dj56t8Mep4nIUvxeSRqCJ7QY+dQRd7Hpm3QrWbYj/cMQ1M0iwr2X/bIwtNyDbx8CE1D5
         Cd5g==
X-Received: by 10.224.205.138 with SMTP id fq10mr2479292qab.1.1369858686731;
        Wed, 29 May 2013 13:18:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org
Original-Received: by 10.49.86.232 with SMTP id s8ls55208qez.94.gmail; Wed, 29 May 2013
 13:18:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.224.78.193 with SMTP id m1mr4614671qak.79.1369858685605;
        Wed, 29 May 2013 13:18:05 -0700 (PDT)
Original-Received: from mail-qa0-x235.google.com (mail-qa0-x235.google.com [2607:f8b0:400d:c00::235])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c10si31406418qam.39.2013.05.29.13.18.05
        for <std-proposals@isocpp.org>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Wed, 29 May 2013 13:18:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nliber@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c00::235 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400d:c00::235;
Original-Received: by mail-qa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id bs12so2445816qab.19
        for <std-proposals@isocpp.org>; Wed, 29 May 2013 13:18:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.224.216.133 with SMTP id hi5mr4769890qab.3.1369858685458;
 Wed, 29 May 2013 13:18:05 -0700 (PDT)
Original-Sender: nliber@gmail.com
Original-Received: by 10.49.64.165 with HTTP; Wed, 29 May 2013 13:17:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAGsORuAQGpB5UxBr+GetOLxyPpBs93MEsZNV4RGk-o_c-_buvg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Original-Sender: nevin@eviloverlord.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;       spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of nliber@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c00::235 as permitted
 sender) smtp.mail=nliber@gmail.com;       dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org
List-ID: <std-proposals.isocpp.org>
X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/post?hl=en>,
 <mailto:std-proposals@isocpp.org>
List-Help: <http://support.google.com/a/isocpp.org/bin/topic.py?hl=en&topic=25838>,
 <mailto:std-proposals+help@isocpp.org>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/?hl=en>
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/subscribe?hl=en>,
 <mailto:std-proposals+subscribe@isocpp.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/subscribe?hl=en>,
 <mailto:googlegroups-manage+399137483710+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:4721
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals/4721>

--20cf3010ede756e00904dde114cb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On 29 May 2013 14:33, Zhihao Yuan <lichray@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> > And how long will that take? C++14 is closed for new stuff, and the whole
> > "deprecation/removal" process will require at least 2 revisions. So it
> would
> > be C++20 at least before we can finally create a real `vector` of real
> > `bool`s.
>
> The "removal" touches no working interfaces -- very
> important -- this is not a removal (from some degree).
>
> I'm going to draft a simple proposal anyway, and see if it's OK
> for a TS/C++17.


Until it is a proposal, it's your time to waste, but so far every committee
member who has spoken in this thread is against just removing it from C++17
on the technicality that the space optimization is not required by the
standard.  I'm pretty sure such a proposal will not take up much committee
time.


>  Considering the implementation and adoption
> period, the users (are there any?) should have enough time to
> switch to a boost::dynamic_bitset, or even some replacement
> we are going to provide in the standard.
>

Removing useful functionality that users depend on without providing a
suitable replacement is very unlikely to pass. (And much as I like Boost,
pointing users to Boost is not an acceptable substitute.)
-- 
 Nevin ":-)" Liber  <mailto:nevin@eviloverlord.com>  (847) 691-1404

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/?hl=en.



--20cf3010ede756e00904dde114cb
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 29 May 2013 14:33, Zhihao Yuan <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:l=
ichray@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">lichray@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:=
<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"m=
argin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">

<br><div class=3D"im">
&gt; And how long will that take? C++14 is closed for new stuff, and the wh=
ole<br>
&gt; &quot;deprecation/removal&quot; process will require at least 2 revisi=
ons. So it would<br>
&gt; be C++20 at least before we can finally create a real `vector` of real=
<br>
&gt; `bool`s.<br>
<br>
</div>The &quot;removal&quot; touches no working interfaces -- very<br>
important -- this is not a removal (from some degree).<br>
<br>
I&#39;m going to draft a simple proposal anyway, and see if it&#39;s OK<br>
for a TS/C++17.</blockquote><div><br>Until it is a proposal, it&#39;s your =
time to waste, but so far every committee member who has spoken in this thr=
ead is against just removing it from C++17 on the technicality that the spa=
ce optimization is not required by the standard.=A0 I&#39;m pretty sure suc=
h a proposal will not take up much committee time.<br>

=A0</div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;borde=
r-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> =A0Considering the implementation =
and adoption<br>
period, the users (are there any?) should have enough time to<br>
switch to a boost::dynamic_bitset, or even some replacement<br>
we are going to provide in the standard.<br></blockquote><div><br>Removing =
useful functionality that users depend on without providing a suitable repl=
acement is very unlikely to pass. (And much as I like Boost, pointing users=
 to Boost is not an acceptable substitute.)<br>

</div></div>-- <br>=A0Nevin &quot;:-)&quot; Liber=A0 &lt;mailto:<a href=3D"=
mailto:nevin@eviloverlord.com" target=3D"_blank">nevin@eviloverlord.com</a>=
&gt;=A0 (847) 691-1404

<p></p>

-- <br />
&nbsp;<br />
--- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.<br />
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/=
std-proposals/?hl=3Den">http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-pro=
posals/?hl=3Den</a>.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
&nbsp;<br />

--20cf3010ede756e00904dde114cb--

.
