220 4556 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nevin Liber Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Re: N3558 :A standardized representation of Asynchronous operation Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 15:24:20 -0500 Lines: 65 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: <519F9E48.7050700@wanadoo.fr> <519FB94F.7090703@wanadoo.fr> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0023543329e6e6a12204dd7c9718 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1369427106 8403 80.91.229.3 (24 May 2013 20:25:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 20:25:06 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBCE35H5S6IDBBHUZ76GAKGQELFFBVLY@isocpp.org Fri May 24 22:25:06 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-qe0-f72.google.com ([209.85.128.72]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UfyXx-00080w-8U for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 May 2013 22:25:05 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-qe0-f72.google.com with SMTP id b4sf6443683qen.11 for ; Fri, 24 May 2013 13:25:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-beenthere:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=4BPrAl2FEf9vM3lBshpAo0W5ZxjdprNOk8ssefjXpeg=; b=OBpJTz8LIVfVQgpU3FBGt6/qYf3VoJDogxZ++0r0cCI1s9KEGCMvksYPTwhbQQdB70 gxOXn4YNWpW6AR4mUZ4Ap70aiqABF45lnkAUKUOwG0Ta2zChOE8lLWfL2fgpyEWbM8p3 9E2CxsHcDGdhavuAxDnoQRlNIeo7n580JFIQhUNWEezObxIg1s0mWBOWgRUPfYJCdrtJ 5SuBym7+hw42+rwMDiC8aCe3eK2AI1MFVBniDzvr9H6G5CX5xURbSklrLIRWe2kBQQ5i v3bwLi5MwuIvUQS7v+RUlxm+gp785MaCh8xr9gt33s646/W2Wmuzr7RMv/pYLO8WgH46 SW0g== X-Received: by 10.236.93.116 with SMTP id k80mr9163822yhf.32.1369427104370; Fri, 24 May 2013 13:25:04 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.49.12.143 with SMTP id y15ls2131944qeb.82.gmail; Fri, 24 May 2013 13:25:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.224.184.78 with SMTP id cj14mr8340977qab.69.1369427101315; Fri, 24 May 2013 13:25:01 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from mail-qc0-x22f.google.com (mail-qc0-x22f.google.com [2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22f]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t15si6715585qcw.89.2013.05.24.13.25.01 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 24 May 2013 13:25:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nliber@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22f as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22f; Original-Received: by mail-qc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id a1so2624098qcx.20 for ; Fri, 24 May 2013 13:25:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.229.106.162 with SMTP id x34mr3570703qco.68.1369427100995; Fri, 24 May 2013 13:25:00 -0700 (PDT) Original-Sender: nliber@gmail.com Original-Received: by 10.49.130.39 with HTTP; Fri, 24 May 2013 13:24:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <519FB94F.7090703@wanadoo.fr> X-Original-Sender: nevin@eviloverlord.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of nliber@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22f as permitted sender) smtp.mail=nliber@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:4556 Archived-At: --0023543329e6e6a12204dd7c9718 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 24 May 2013 14:02, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote: > > Returning future>>> would provide efficiency > and safety. > If you are going to go this route, please don't use pair. It is much better to have field names that mean something. Nevin ":-)" Liber (847) 691-1404 -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/?hl=en. --0023543329e6e6a12204dd7c9718 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 24 May 2013 14:02, Vicente J. Botet Escriba <vicente.botet@wanad= oo.fr> wrote:
=20 =20 =20

Returning future<pair<size_t, vector<future<R>>>> would provide efficiency and safety.

If you are going to go this route, please don't use pair.= =A0 It is much better to have field names that mean something.
=A0Nevin = ":-)" Liber=A0 <mailto:nevin@eviloverlord.com>=A0 (847) 691-1404

--
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-pro= posals/?hl=3Den.
 
 
--0023543329e6e6a12204dd7c9718-- .