220 4398 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Zhihao Yuan Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: std::putf now supports %N%, like Boost.Format Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 20:09:31 -0400 Lines: 31 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: <66ac5a48-8d1a-41f3-92ac-085c3b7de87a@isocpp.org> <75cd8f0a-81be-40d5-84a5-69287b3b18e2@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1368490174 6260 80.91.229.3 (14 May 2013 00:09:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 00:09:34 +0000 (UTC) To: "std-proposals@isocpp.org" Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBCUILMGRQMARBPEBY2GAKGQE2WVLAGQ@isocpp.org Tue May 14 02:09:35 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-ee0-f70.google.com ([74.125.83.70]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Uc2o9-00061r-WA for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 May 2013 02:09:34 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-ee0-f70.google.com with SMTP id e50sf4155882eek.1 for ; Mon, 13 May 2013 17:09:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:received-spf:mime-version :x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=5jmP64OqVeXpupBitgGQ9fxDieChWbHe4nriWbgPywE=; b=CMQgI4Al5CZ3QPJPThI/RcKrC6PG75oUFIkNrIvzgKRS1NWB4LWCS4UTgvGPvZ9SX9 9DU/fy4PCkhi5iaJmfthBCeeCPKjGEInX/ZpJBPxxXPXqO5CLqRVbbRp6G4sthBejBDE e4fxPPC1Xc5CVLKT42wY1x+MnsUErJuwiBYKjtTWgDIb8IMcfHVJBi+rOg8vkFuBfSbH t2+Qa0iwTZFdKFaxYBBEqJtOWKdGLnTeVW6KtOoORlYlV8CZuw9HPQZdZmABGIN2vrw1 VZM30cHOPAHTmc2LwDSPlw/3PeIVOkF0NZQ7f3ThP5mLNna7uHLly+X8jilmMPRXCx/c X-Received: by 10.112.145.196 with SMTP id sw4mr9768569lbb.5.1368490173145; Mon, 13 May 2013 17:09:33 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.152.20.167 with SMTP id o7ls387lae.4.gmail; Mon, 13 May 2013 17:09:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.112.125.232 with SMTP id mt8mr11109420lbb.55.1368490171715; Mon, 13 May 2013 17:09:31 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from mail-la0-x233.google.com (mail-la0-x233.google.com [2a00:1450:4010:c03::233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id aa3si5260714lbc.272.2013.05.13.17.09.31 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 13 May 2013 17:09:31 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lichray@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c03::233 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c03::233; Original-Received: by mail-la0-f51.google.com with SMTP id ep20so6779198lab.38 for ; Mon, 13 May 2013 17:09:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.112.173.39 with SMTP id bh7mr13972943lbc.62.1368490171546; Mon, 13 May 2013 17:09:31 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.112.59.233 with HTTP; Mon, 13 May 2013 17:09:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <75cd8f0a-81be-40d5-84a5-69287b3b18e2@isocpp.org> X-Original-Sender: lichray@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lichray@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c03::233 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lichray@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:4398 Archived-At: On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Nicol Bolas wrote: >> I wasn't in the room for the discussion but the straw polls showed no >> consensus for adding putf() with only printf-style formatting, strong >> opposition to adding non-printf-style formatting to putf, and unanimous >> support for "a separate format string paper that is not constrained by >> printf" > > Wait. So they don't want "non-printf-style formatting". But they do want "a > separate format string paper that is not constrained by printf". How does > that make sense? The information I read is, they may or may not want a printf-style formatting, but `putf` should not be furtherly extended (I tend to agree since it's actually complex). But they do interested in a modern formatting. -- Zhihao Yuan, ID lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___________________________________________________ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/ -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/?hl=en. .