220 4220 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Fernando Cacciola Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Fixing Standard Library relational operators (was: Re: optional Rev.4 (N3672): What was the rationale to remove !=, >=, ...) Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 18:31:30 -0300 Lines: 101 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b344168942af404dbc2f747 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1367530336 18198 80.91.229.3 (2 May 2013 21:32:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 21:32:16 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBCOPV7FAXQPRBW5WROGAKGQECP4MM5Y@isocpp.org Thu May 02 23:32:15 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-la0-f71.google.com ([209.85.215.71]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UY16q-0008HU-GQ for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 23:32:12 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-la0-f71.google.com with SMTP id ev20sf1535876lab.6 for ; Thu, 02 May 2013 14:32:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:received-spf:x-received :mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=gPRONl4VHkZxg94Ue3ZyUlPOrMU0udMqY1keF1A462g=; b=Q5CCMZ9XD33tJfrX3VjUY9LXshtGsGJE//ZsP6+XZeXxO36gANhm7mCoh3/nMS9Fgr yqoT/V36FQ3XVk0ytLsQHmfL46MgJ8ZoMBQJfdCuL2QrX1MhVLeRabczGYQBAr5C7TGT QNYz6I9KxdkxyeVCt4z638sTmCSm0WIRXyIwSuCpVkWSXuIiun5PEIHbno791bjhVSAn SaUakzgcg8mIvinrOArehoOs4vfpizS4umbKXOnQzP/8Xxe4PSM3a1CuHdpdCCVkGGa1 ESBFhFpdpLUonsXZeoD1sygJTh5MoHdk5+CPWUd4+cQ2ta2oAiVD0kb0wWCkGNQH+b7e X-Received: by 10.152.115.196 with SMTP id jq4mr8537958lab.6.1367530332065; Thu, 02 May 2013 14:32:12 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.152.114.8 with SMTP id jc8ls140686lab.28.gmail; Thu, 02 May 2013 14:32:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.152.3.137 with SMTP id c9mr3240515lac.5.1367530330810; Thu, 02 May 2013 14:32:10 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from mail-lb0-f178.google.com (mail-lb0-f178.google.com [209.85.217.178]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id qg10si1362429lbb.150.2013.05.02.14.32.10 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 02 May 2013 14:32:10 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of fernando.cacciola@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.178 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.217.178; Original-Received: by mail-lb0-f178.google.com with SMTP id x10so987523lbi.37 for ; Thu, 02 May 2013 14:32:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.112.147.170 with SMTP id tl10mr3242407lbb.100.1367530330661; Thu, 02 May 2013 14:32:10 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.114.20.106 with HTTP; Thu, 2 May 2013 14:31:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: fernando.cacciola@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of fernando.cacciola@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.178 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=fernando.cacciola@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:4220 Archived-At: --047d7b344168942af404dbc2f747 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Nevin Liber wrote: > On 2 May 2013 16:24, Fernando Cacciola wrote: > >> >> Actually, if we are going to fix the *entire* library, then we *could* >> chose to have all operators boild down to the underlying component(s) >> > > That would be a major breaking change, since some people count on the > standard library synthesizing operators for them. I'm certainly not going > to propose that. > Hmm, of course. We can't change what's already defined that way. Well, then I'm all sold. > > -- Fernando Cacciola SciSoft Consulting, Founder http://www.scisoft-consulting.com -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/?hl=en. --047d7b344168942af404dbc2f747 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On T= hu, May 2, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Nevin Liber <nevin@eviloverlord.com&g= t; wrote:
On 2 May 2013 16:24, Ferna= ndo Cacciola <fernando.cacciola@gmail.com> wrote:<= br>

Actually, if we are going to fix the *entire* li= brary, then we *could* chose to have all operators boild down to the underl= ying component(s)

That would be a major b= reaking change, since some people count on the standard library synthesizin= g operators for them. I'm certainly not going to propose that.

Hmm, of course. We can't c= hange what's already defined that way.

Well,=A0 then I'm all= sold.
=A0



--
Fernando Ca= cciola
SciSoft Consulting, Founder
http://www.scisoft-consulting.com

--
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-pro= posals/?hl=3Den.
 
 
--047d7b344168942af404dbc2f747-- .