220 4093 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hariharan Subramanian Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Multiple return values Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 10:36:23 +0530 Lines: 108 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: <269d4602-e158-4abc-a9a8-8c3cb453e013@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c34f4076d97304db8cf67c X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1367298389 32280 80.91.229.3 (30 Apr 2013 05:06:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 05:06:29 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBCJZFFHTQQIBBUFC7WFQKGQEX2RX44Y@isocpp.org Tue Apr 30 07:06:28 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-ee0-f69.google.com ([74.125.83.69]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UX2ll-0007hp-PD for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 07:06:25 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-ee0-f69.google.com with SMTP id l10sf146619eei.8 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 22:06:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:received-spf:mime-version :x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=+D05dLQx6O5bsOXyg3kZxJuu+YU2W6Tmlu71Ya14KKs=; b=wMivQqycpktXFnWnmDhy4bUrrtPZGJcRI7FegXA326LhtgPKDhbpNOUHKSsMImSUjU 7XSnDeKYCIv6kIzZylq6lJzMztFoHghd/Bhg+24unQqhKpElWlLl0lOBiGVlyrZgo6BH RQ1RYpjxg6/kU4HHzA8f00hrntwoKu4E+Ve01y8AN8M9ozf3OCkDlAtnp5oCJDGpjGHB L77x139HQYtumBcal3ph4Q9UcWGc+RGE7iOUgqxOGoe37cB++vmcCXS/ghjJe+ymt/MI QFZJSqkiJVT/FXnUS8Q8ntTq58wGYL3V5HV2myXqABu66kqVjBZb2zvTakaKxY6+w0OE X-Received: by 10.112.180.197 with SMTP id dq5mr11368213lbc.14.1367298385085; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 22:06:25 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.152.120.131 with SMTP id lc3ls5527lab.49.gmail; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 22:06:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.152.112.231 with SMTP id it7mr28558307lab.10.1367298383893; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 22:06:23 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from mail-lb0-f181.google.com (mail-lb0-f181.google.com [209.85.217.181]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ps9si1280964lbb.123.2013.04.29.22.06.23 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 29 Apr 2013 22:06:23 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of tohari@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.181 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.217.181; Original-Received: by mail-lb0-f181.google.com with SMTP id 13so172150lba.26 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 22:06:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.152.87.69 with SMTP id v5mr3007273laz.24.1367298383729; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 22:06:23 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.112.33.177 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 22:06:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: tohari@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of tohari@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.181 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=tohari@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:4093 Archived-At: --001a11c34f4076d97304db8cf67c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I wrote the proposal without considering the suggested alternatives. Hence I would like to withdraw this proposal. Thanks for suggesting the alternatives. Hariharan S On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 7:49 PM, DeadMG wrote: > I agree. I'm not saying that there is a core feature that will work for > C++, since language-level support for tuples covers a whole lot more than > his simple use case (although it could, potentially, be used to fix the > very broken uniform initialization). What I am saying is that it's not a > problem which is entirely solved by std::tuple, and it would be a desirable > feature to have. > > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/d/topic/std-proposals/VROimyg83fc/unsubscribe?hl=en > . > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. > To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. > Visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/?hl=en. > > > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/?hl=en. --001a11c34f4076d97304db8cf67c Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I wrote the proposal without considering the suggested alt= ernatives. Hence I would like to withdraw this proposal. Thanks for suggest= ing the alternatives.

Hariharan S


On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 7:49 PM, DeadMG = <wolfeinstein@gmail.com> wrote:
I agree. I'm not saying that there is a core feature that will work for= C++, since language-level support for tuples covers a whole lot more than = his simple use case (although it could, potentially, be used to fix the ver= y broken uniform initialization). What I am saying is that it's not a p= roblem which is entirely solved by std::tuple, and it would be a desirable = feature to have.

--
=A0
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Goog= le Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/d/topic/std-proposals/VR= Oimyg83fc/unsubscribe?hl=3Den.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to std-pr= oposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp= ..org/group/std-proposals/?hl=3Den.
=A0
=A0

--
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-pro= posals/?hl=3Den.
 
 
--001a11c34f4076d97304db8cf67c-- .