220 4072 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ville Voutilainen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: Multiple return values Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:15:46 +0300 Lines: 65 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: <269d4602-e158-4abc-a9a8-8c3cb453e013@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d044789055f218e04db8085e2 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1367244948 7215 80.91.229.3 (29 Apr 2013 14:15:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:15:48 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBC5JHI7A7ALRBE4B7KFQKGQEWKY4UYY@isocpp.org Mon Apr 29 16:15:51 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-oa0-f69.google.com ([209.85.219.69]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UWort-0004cL-FY for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 16:15:49 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-oa0-f69.google.com with SMTP id l20sf39681092oag.0 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:15:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:received-spf:mime-version :x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=mdYlRscWpXZQqMmWoXkiYNrOmQPJp9bUqc7pvUKx+xE=; b=hLBnecnyTOgPQslgkaC6PPqpKf28faxpFnV2Lq4knIjuMNk2FDwlEFUJZy1C34zb2J /1040cuplotqc11CVEZOyinYJs3fMdAh6VTQGPYUPMx0CqhCFI49U5qPZx8MwyXcTKhZ 0MTL6FQKGU2h+hk4vmHfJQTb7JTm26U7de6HWTWK/QXX2fPyx541cX2oUurqN7w8VaFj g6swH75pTOm+eKvR5MosAmm+z2v66amYiBGQX3MRcMabxR4XlfU58iNHjsSuWkSD9ZkC LIhmx8j03UDSUYV+iqlScbJAOQIhChruS99ZXJTm1IVXGg4iqlmiGPTSW+DpwY8K20dj X-Received: by 10.182.129.116 with SMTP id nv20mr1753104obb.40.1367244948277; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:15:48 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.182.65.73 with SMTP id v9ls191004obs.55.gmail; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:15:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.60.42.71 with SMTP id m7mr11272547oel.44.1367244946877; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:15:46 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from mail-oa0-f47.google.com (mail-oa0-f47.google.com [209.85.219.47]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id zb4si11200976obb.62.2013.04.29.07.15.46 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:15:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ville.voutilainen@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.47 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.219.47; Original-Received: by mail-oa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id n9so6180790oag.34 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:15:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.182.160.106 with SMTP id xj10mr27775039obb.98.1367244946741; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:15:46 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.76.10.130 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:15:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: ville.voutilainen@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ville.voutilainen@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.47 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ville.voutilainen@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:4072 Archived-At: --f46d044789055f218e04db8085e2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 29 April 2013 17:09, DeadMG wrote: > He has a valid point, I think. Returning tuples and especially unpacking > on the other end isn't as easy as it could be in some languages with core > language support for this- for example, Lua. > > > > Perhaps so. I'm just pointing out in a rather friendly manner that adding such core language support may end up being an uphill battle. -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/?hl=en. --f46d044789055f218e04db8085e2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



On 29 April 2013 17:09, DeadMG <wolfeinstein@gmail.com>= ; wrote:
He has a valid point, I think. Returning tup= les and especially unpacking on the other end isn't as easy as it could= be in some languages with core language support for this- for example, Lua= ..




Perhaps so. I'm ju= st pointing out in a rather friendly manner that adding such core language = support may end
up being an uphill battle.

--
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-pro= posals/?hl=3Den.
 
 
--f46d044789055f218e04db8085e2-- .