220 3629 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tony V E Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: "break break ;" etc. to break out of nested loops Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 15:32:27 -0400 Lines: 112 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: <1f964e4b-2762-43b8-85e5-41392926b07a@isocpp.org> <199aad3f-d30d-468c-91c2-983f1a3e358c@isocpp.org> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c34d9a3a930904d9de7f19 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1365449545 17555 80.91.229.3 (8 Apr 2013 19:32:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 19:32:25 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBCUZ5QWKNQIMZNUMRMCRUBG2VIHCY@isocpp.org Mon Apr 08 21:32:29 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-fa0-f70.google.com ([209.85.161.70]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UPHnp-0004YD-DD for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 21:32:29 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-fa0-f70.google.com with SMTP id t1sf5086586fae.9 for ; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 12:32:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-beenthere:x-received:received-spf:mime-version :x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=NChUI2tJWSfFbbAx2g2pJgGGfa5HILU8lnVoh04umxc=; b=BeI3r2URJJr1ZBbeO960st9ijFzPkTTDeoxTeuX8sPEndhvQdPTWmErOMmwYKi58Sx Ue7ilmMuEcARSLqMRoCJO5RkOuRHpw2bfI0e7eIrU/FhdXPNIVRXe/68KbsyR8IAqrfh f3IHjtQSWnQb/samf0Pr3Gp+uykSijNhrir+MqYcDIr8/j2gOOoVIoO8UoJFq40t2uRh 6ZCRTIeh2uO6j3ePf5yllurLJc9uL/TlwqO5Vm3XHXXLoTkFX1eeMkK5lrH8dXy2vzrX XECU9nglu8UykwATvZhjTJ3JPb1kcwC6sAnMdY30YOBtYrdXLSLZd4qpAhuixhz1ymOx X-Received: by 10.152.135.106 with SMTP id pr10mr4019771lab.6.1365449548580; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 12:32:28 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.152.110.227 with SMTP id id3ls267128lab.40.gmail; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 12:32:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.152.133.130 with SMTP id pc2mr12307787lab.51.1365449547531; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 12:32:27 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from mail-lb0-f172.google.com (mail-lb0-f172.google.com [209.85.217.172]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ao10si4591601lac.163.2013.04.08.12.32.27 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Apr 2013 12:32:27 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of tvaneerd@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.172 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.217.172; Original-Received: by mail-lb0-f172.google.com with SMTP id u10so6109560lbi.3 for ; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 12:32:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.152.87.73 with SMTP id v9mr12559857laz.2.1365449547352; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 12:32:27 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.112.83.103 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 12:32:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <199aad3f-d30d-468c-91c2-983f1a3e358c@isocpp.org> X-Original-Sender: tvaneerd@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of tvaneerd@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.172 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=tvaneerd@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:3629 Archived-At: --001a11c34d9a3a930904d9de7f19 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 3:37 PM, wrote: > On Saturday, April 6, 2013 9:32:05 PM UTC+2, Richard Smith wrote: > > I think I would prefer >> >> for outer (...) { >> for (...) { >> if (...) >> break outer; >> } >> } >> >> Using a label to refer to its labeled statement feels like an abuse of >> the facility to me. >> > > Please, can we leave labels and other identifiers out of this? You don't > have to support my proposal, but I wish you wouldn't all try to distort it > like this. You can submit your own proposals, after all. > > The purpose of this email list is, I think, to discuss proposals and "pre-proposals" (ideas). Both here, and in actual committee meetings, I think you should *expect* to get not just like/dislike but alternative suggestions. Also, note that many of the people commenting here are the same people that would vote for/against your proposal in the committee. In general, you should be prepared to modify/compromise your proposal if you wish to get it (or at least its essence) accepted. I agree you are absolutely free to submit a formal proposal of whatever you think is best, as could someone else. But I would try to listen to and consider the suggestions given. Tony -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/?hl=en. --001a11c34d9a3a930904d9de7f19 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 3:37 PM, <temptony@freemail.hu><= /span> wrote:
On Saturday, April 6,= 2013 9:32:05 PM UTC+2, Richard Smith wrote:

I think I would prefer

for outer (...) {
=A0 for (...) {
=A0=A0=A0 if (...)
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 break outer;
=A0 }
}

Using a label to refer to its labeled statement feels like a= n abuse of the facility to me.

=A0
Ple= ase, can we leave labels and other identifiers out of this? You don't h= ave to support my proposal, but I wish you wouldn't all try to distort = it like this. You can submit your own proposals, after all.


The purpose of this email = list is, I think, to discuss proposals and "pre-proposals" (ideas= ).=A0 Both here, and in actual committee meetings, I think you should *expe= ct* to get not just like/dislike but alternative suggestions.=A0

Also, note that many of the people commenting here are the s= ame people that would vote for/against your proposal in the committee.
<= br>
In general, you should be prepared to modify/compromise your = proposal if you wish to get it (or at least its essence) accepted.

I agree you are absolutely free to submit a formal proposal = of whatever you think is best, as could someone else.=A0 But I would try to= listen to and consider the suggestions given.

Tony

--
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-pro= posals/?hl=3Den.
 
 
--001a11c34d9a3a930904d9de7f19-- .