220 3610 article Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: temptony@freemail.hu Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals Subject: Re: "break break ;" etc. to break out of nested loops Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2013 04:32:06 -0700 (PDT) Lines: 55 Approved: news@gmane.org Message-ID: References: <1f964e4b-2762-43b8-85e5-41392926b07a@isocpp.org> <51614514.2060103@bubblescope.net> Reply-To: std-proposals@isocpp.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3414_14335724.1365334326017" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1365334324 28339 80.91.229.3 (7 Apr 2013 11:32:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2013 11:32:04 +0000 (UTC) To: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-X-From: std-proposals+bncBCF55ZN354IBBNVSQWFQKGQEWEIV2JI@isocpp.org Sun Apr 07 13:32:08 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-vb0-f70.google.com ([209.85.212.70]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UOnpP-0006M0-RN for gclcip-std-proposals@m.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Apr 2013 13:32:07 +0200 Original-Received: by mail-vb0-f70.google.com with SMTP id 11sf6314546vbf.9 for ; Sun, 07 Apr 2013 04:32:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.224.65.6 with SMTP id g6mr3295413qai.4.1365334326759; Sun, 07 Apr 2013 04:32:06 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: std-proposals@isocpp.org Original-Received: by 10.49.71.166 with SMTP id w6ls2560257qeu.14.gmail; Sun, 07 Apr 2013 04:32:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.49.72.225 with SMTP id g1mr1367944qev.36.1365334326394; Sun, 07 Apr 2013 04:32:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51614514.2060103@bubblescope.net> X-Original-Sender: temptony@freemail.hu Precedence: list Mailing-list: list std-proposals@isocpp.org; contact std-proposals+owners@isocpp.org List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 399137483710 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.c++.isocpp.proposals:3610 Archived-At: ------=_Part_3414_14335724.1365334326017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sunday, April 7, 2013 12:06:12 PM UTC+2, Chris Jefferson wrote: Serious question: If this is equivalent to 'goto ContinueExecution', then > why not just teach people to use goto? That has the advantage that I don't > have to be careful to figure out where 'break break break;' will go, I can > see the label! > > Chris > You could ask exactly the same question about the simple *break* statement, which many programmers find very handy! -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org. To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/?hl=en. ------=_Part_3414_14335724.1365334326017 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sunday, April 7, 2013 12:06:12 PM UTC+2, Chris Jefferson wrote:

Serious question: If this is equivalent to 'goto ContinueExecution', then why not just teach people to use goto? That has the advantage that I don't have to be careful to figure out where 'break break break;' will go, I can see the label!

Chris

You could ask exactly the same question about the simple *break* statement, which many programmers find very handy!

--
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ISO C++ Standard - Future Proposals" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to std-proposals+unsubscribe@isocpp.org.
To post to this group, send email to std-proposals@isocpp.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/group/std-proposals/?hl=en.
 
 
------=_Part_3414_14335724.1365334326017-- .