From -6295921181515408886
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f78e5,f9d03435d36a70ff
X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1990-08-26 22:39:33 PST
Path: gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!decwrl!ucbvax!pasteur!baobab.berkeley.edu!twagner
From: twagner@baobab.berkeley.edu (Tim Wagner)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
Subject: Re: 'const' revisited
Message-ID: <27223@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: 27 Aug 90 00:33:10 GMT
References: <26909@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> <11194@alice.UUCP> <140877@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> <CIMSHOP!DAVIDM.90Aug20002153@uunet.UU.NET> <56745@microsoft.UUCP>
Sender: news@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: twagner@baobab.berkeley.edu (Tim Wagner)
Distribution: comp
Lines: 11
Posted: Mon Aug 27 01:33:10 1990

Unfortunately, what does one do when per-instance information is
required?  The following cannot possibly be acceptable to anyone:

#pragma this-means-really-const
const i;
#pragma this-means-interface-const
const j;
...

'pragma' as a replacement for language-integrated type information
would be the supreme sacrifice in this case.