From -8284075823422190240
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f78e5,50f0ad542032bb80
X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-08-30 06:32:02 PST
Path: gmdzi!unido!fauern!iraun1.ira.uka.de!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!att!dptg!ulysses!andante!alice!ark
From: ark@alice.att.com (Andrew Koenig)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
Subject: Re: It's a lot worse than it sounds (was Re: The problem with temp...)
Keywords: nasty ugly pain operators strings owiee
Message-ID: <20798@alice.att.com>
Date: 30 Aug 91 07:53:07 GMT
References: <15751@goofy.Apple.COM> <15848@goofy.Apple.COM> <20797@alice.att.com> <1991Aug29.230533.22972@agate.berkeley.edu>
Reply-To: ark@alice.UUCP ()
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Liberty Corner NJ
Lines: 11

In article <1991Aug29.230533.22972@agate.berkeley.edu> jbuck@forney.berkeley.edu (Joe Buck) writes:

> I took your course a year and a half ago, Andy, and that's what you
> told us.  Unfortunately, no one has taught cfront (as of version 2.1)
> how to do it, even in simple cases like the following:

Right you are -- cfront 2.1 doesn't support this particular optimization.
At this point, though, it looks like cfront 3.0 will.
-- 
				--Andrew Koenig
				  ark@europa.att.com