From -7148722711642530088
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,109af18a94b8a35c
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: f78e5,e5cae9ffbf1dd57e
X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-10-04 15:43:38 PST
Xref: sparky comp.std.c++:1300 comp.lang.c++:14513
Path: sparky!uunet!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!wupost!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!att!allegra!alice!ark
From: ark@alice.att.com (Andrew Koenig)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c++,comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: The concept of templates considered ill designed
Message-ID: <23801@alice.att.com>
Date: 5 Oct 92 02:44:53 GMT
Article-I.D.: alice.23801
References: <RAYMOND.92Sep29122502@cobra.es.ele.tue.nl> <1992Oct1.140643.9775@cadsun.corp.mot.com> <1992Oct2.153826.12051@ucc.su.OZ.AU> <BvM0DE.EA7@watcgl.uwaterloo.ca> <23796@alice.att.com> <Ienr=wm00awU8A=Ecc@andrew.cmu.edu>
Reply-To: ark@alice.UUCP ()
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill NJ
Lines: 9

In article <Ienr=wm00awU8A=Ecc@andrew.cmu.edu> osoelgaultier+@CMU.EDU (Stefan Monnier) writes:

> But the suggested 'templates with type constraint' would
> permit to change it into an implementation issue.

Really?  Why do you think so?
-- 
				--Andrew Koenig
				  ark@europa.att.com