From 8404443485854682895
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f78e5,7173a1363a21a8ed,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-10-02 09:46:46 PST
Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!malgudi.oar.net!news.ans.net!cmcl2!acf5!checker
From: checker@acf5.NYU.EDU (checker)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
Subject: Re: Forward declaration of classes
Message-ID: <1961@acf5.NYU.EDU>
Date: 2 Oct 92 04:16:26 GMT
References: <1992Oct1.214825.20001@lgc.com>
Organization: New York University
Lines: 10

srinivas@lgc.com (Manapragada Srinivas) writes:
>Is the following forward declaration valid?
>		class foo : public bar;

No.  I think the standards committee is looking into different ways of
`forward declaring' more information.  Nested types also present similar
problems.

Chris