From -4290197473654861955
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1149ec,c0f8f764e8b7d30f
X-Google-Attributes: gid1149ec,public
X-Google-Thread: f78e5,c0f8f764e8b7d30f
X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-12-19 15:59:34 PST
Xref: sparky comp.std.c++:1837 comp.std.c:3231
Path: sparky!uunet!sdrc!thor!scjones
From: scjones@thor.sdrc.com (Larry Jones)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c++,comp.std.c
Subject: Re: Question about sizeof in C/C++.
Message-ID: <2410@sdrc.COM>
Date: 17 Dec 92 22:30:23 GMT
References: <jamesc.724544278@bart> <wwJXVB3w164w@amfent.Gwinnett.COM>
Sender: news@sdrc.COM
Followup-To: comp.std.c++
Lines: 10

In article <wwJXVB3w164w@amfent.Gwinnett.COM>, amf@amfent.Gwinnett.COM (Andy Feibus) writes:
> Different compilers see &ps[k]
> differently; use parentheses to clarify: &(ps[k]).

Anything that sees &ps[k] as being different than &(ps[k]) is
*NOT* a C compiler.
----
Larry Jones, SDRC, 2000 Eastman Dr., Milford, OH  45150-2789  513-576-2070
larry.jones@sdrc.com  or  ...uunet!sdrc!larry.jones
I think we need to change the rules. -- Calvin


