From 6539458261177923007 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f78e5,8366734ec6aad121 X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-06-15 04:35:45 PST Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Path: nntp.gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!agate!msuinfo!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.cs.su.oz.au!metro!news From: maxtal@physics.su.OZ.AU (John Max Skaller) Subject: Re: new foo[0] Message-ID: Sender: news@ucc.su.OZ.AU Nntp-Posting-Host: physics.su.oz.au Organization: School of Physics, University of Sydney, Australia References: <2tk0dq$6ej@hpsystem1.informatik.tu-muenchen.de> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 1994 11:12:50 GMT Lines: 15 In article jason@cygnus.com (Jason Merrill) writes: > >As I said in my previous article, this is not true for all arrays, only >arrays of objects that have either destructors or an operator delete [] >which wants to know the size of the block of memory. All class types have destructors, if not user written then compiler generated. In both cases the destructor may be 'trivial', that is, be optimisable to nothing. -- JOHN (MAX) SKALLER, INTERNET:maxtal@suphys.physics.su.oz.au Maxtal Pty Ltd, CSERVE:10236.1703 6 MacKay St ASHFIELD, Mem: SA IT/9/22,SC22/WG21 NSW 2131, AUSTRALIA