From 1546913622761772857 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f78e5,501baa494c3fb66e X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-11-07 07:55:45 PST Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Path: nntp.gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news.moneng.mei.com!hookup!news.mathworks.com!yeshua.marcam.com!zip.eecs.umich.edu!caen!msuinfo!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.cs.su.oz.au!metro!news From: maxtal@physics.su.OZ.AU (John Max Skaller) Subject: Re: Whatever happened to nested func's? Message-ID: Sender: news@ucc.su.OZ.AU Nntp-Posting-Host: physics.su.oz.au Organization: School of Physics, University of Sydney, Australia References: <39dnbu$7h@hpsystem1.informatik.tu-muenchen.de> Date: Mon, 7 Nov 1994 04:50:50 GMT Lines: 16 >In article , milod@netcom.com (John DiCamillo) writes: >|> Hi! >|> >|> I seem to remember that there was a proposal to >|> the committee to remove the current restriction >|> and allow nested functions. > I put that proposal, it was rejected by the extensions subgroup and never came before the committee as a whole. Too bad. Everything _else_ in C++ nests properly. -- JOHN (MAX) SKALLER, INTERNET:maxtal@suphys.physics.su.oz.au Maxtal Pty Ltd, 81A Glebe Point Rd, GLEBE Mem: SA IT/9/22,SC22/WG21 NSW 2037, AUSTRALIA Phone: 61-2-566-2189