From 3795720824776984702
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f78e5,716cdb25f9d4b10f
X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-11-18 11:52:28 PST
Path: nntp.gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news.moneng.mei.com!hookup!olivea!koriel!news2me.EBay.Sun.COM!engnews2.Eng.Sun.COM!usenet
From: clamage@Eng.Sun.COM (Steve Clamage)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
Subject: Re: ERROR in Annotated C++ Reference Manual?
Date: 18 Nov 1994 17:11:05 GMT
Organization: Sun Microcomputer Corporation
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <3ain79$ogs@engnews2.Eng.Sun.COM>
References: <PAULVL.94Nov17135738@python.es.ele.tue.nl>
Reply-To: clamage@Eng.Sun.COM
NNTP-Posting-Host: taumet.eng.sun.com

In article 94Nov17135738@python.es.ele.tue.nl, paulvl@python.es.ele.tue.nl (Paul van Loon) writes:
>When reading my copy of the AC++RM again,
>I noticed something I suspect to be an error.
>Can anyone confirm or deny the following:
>
>In the chapter about trigrams (?) there
>is a list of all defined trigrams
>but ??< and ??> are not on the list.
>The example program below the list
>uses ??< for { and ??> for }.
>Therefore the list is not
>complete and should contain ??< for {
>and ??> for }

Yes, it's an error. The list is supposed to be the same as in ISO C.

>The copy of the AC++RM I have is the first edition.

There is only one edition, although there have been many printings. Each
new printing has corrected minor errors missed in earlier printings.
---
Steve Clamage, stephen.clamage@eng.sun.com




