From -1707125761052278560
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f78e5,ac06fef48c3c04df
X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,ac06fef48c3c04df
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-01-21 16:34:50 PST
Path: nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!nntpserver.pppl.gov!princeton!udel!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!usenet
From: graehl@usc.edu (Jonathan Graehl)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.std.c++
Subject: Re: friends and local classes
Date: 22 Jan 1995 00:34:50 GMT
Organization: USC
Lines: 11
Sender: graehl@comserv-b-52.usc.edu
Message-ID: <3fs97a$17c@usc.edu>
References: <3frgln$deh@senator-bedfellow.MIT.EDU> <3froli$gss@news.panix.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: comserv-b-52.usc.edu
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.92.5
Xref: nntp.gmd.de comp.lang.c++:87398 comp.std.c++:11202

this function
>now calls a function in another class, does it pass the friendship
>factor on?
>
>Is friend dynamically or statically bound, really?

Well, all access rules are checked at compile time, so they would be
statically bound.


Jonathan Graehl