From -2661999002829261981 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f78e5,18172b9bc6faab66 X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public From: goodse_j@faceplant.motsat.sat.mot.com (John Goodsen) Subject: Namespaces (was Re: ANSI C++ Public Comments) Date: 1995/05/09 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 102316883 sender: news@schbbs.mot.com (SCHBBS News Account) references: <3o8ld5$oma@offas_dike.sbil.co.uk> organization: The Dalmatian Group, Inc. newsgroups: comp.std.c++ In article <3o8ld5$oma@offas_dike.sbil.co.uk> shepherd@debussy.sbi.com (Marc Shepherd) writes: By contrast, namespaces are a creation out of thin air. This is not to say that they don't address a legitimate need--only that there is little real-world C++ experience with anything at all resembling namespaces. Ada packages are very close to namespaces in C++. This added level of packages is extremely valuable in large scale projects. Namespaces are just as valuable in large scale C++ projects, IMHO. -- -- John Goodsen Currently On-Site: Rapid Engineering Specialist Motorola Satellite Communications The Dalmatian Group, Inc. Phoenix, AZ jgoodsen@dalmatian.com Todays Weather: Getting Hotter ;-)