From 8349520307498331123
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,97482af7429a6a62
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,371d317eff97da58
X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public
X-Google-Thread: f78e5,d0101e78f246296b
X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public
X-Google-Thread: 10bca1,37f5012c390e46a6
X-Google-Attributes: gid10bca1,public
From: jhalpin@netcom.com (Joe Halpin)
Subject: Re: C+@ Tails
Date: 1995/06/06
Message-ID: <jhalpinD9q8FM.3C1@netcom.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 103919326
sender: jhalpin@netcom8.netcom.com
references: <MATT.95Jun4223325@godzilla.EECS.Berkeley.EDU> <3qu9il$342@News1.mcs.com> <D9ptu1.2nI@research.att.com>
organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
newsgroups: comp.object,comp.lang.c++,comp.std.c++,alt.culture.internet

In article <D9ptu1.2nI@research.att.com> bs@research.att.com (Bjarne Stroustrup <9758-26353> 0112760) writes:

[commendably restrained comments deleted]

>
>	Maybe the right approach is the one recommended or chain
>	letters and inappropriate junk mailings: return the message
>	containing insults, slander, or innuendo to ``postmaster''
>	at the originating site (in this case, postmaster@bytes.com).
>	I'll try that for a while and see what happens. If enough
>	others do the same maybe we will be allowed to get back to
>	technical issues.
>
>		- Bjarne
>

I would like to express my complete agreement with this, and suggest
we all follow this suggestion.

Joe
-- 
Joe Halpin 
jhalpin@netcom.com 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------