From -4253740320139945584
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,fddfa855dc41ba0d
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: f78e5,fddfa855dc41ba0d
X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public
From: tony@online.tmx.com.au (Tony Cook)
Subject: Re: Namespaces, naming conflicts
Date: 1995/06/13
Message-ID: <DA379D.Jr6@online.tmx.com.au>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 104328641
references: <3r79jk$3se@nms.telepost.no>
organization: Home
followup-to: comp.lang.c++,comp.std.c++
newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.std.c++

Rune Huseby (Rune.huseby@gpi.telemax.no) wrote:

: I know that namespaces was introduced to avoid naming-conflicts across 
: libraries, but who defines the namespace names? It is possible that two 
: vendors simultanously defines equal namespaces for their libraries, like 
: 'ODBCLib' or similar. I would expect that the vendors would try to keep the 
: namespace names as short as possible, so programmers don't have to write 
: something similar to 'Microsofts_ODBC_library::Connect()'

It's possible for a vendor to define a long name such as
	Microsofts_ODBC_library
and then define a short alias.
-- 
        Tony Cook - tony@online.tmx.com.au
                    100237.3425@compuserve.com



