From -6444012874403155246 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109fba,9016040bdb0b33c4 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: f78e5,9016040bdb0b33c4 X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public From: Raymond Wan Subject: Re: C++/C Compilers Date: 1995/08/03 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 107438616 references: <3vgpo7$jnl@nnrp.ucs.ubc.ca> <9508040343.AA04776@syacus.acus.oz.au> x-sender: rkwan@interchg.ubc.ca content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII organization: The University of British Columbia mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.std.c++ Well, whether or not C++/C does OO programming well is beside the point. Sometimes you have to ask yourself, are schools, etc. using C++ because it does OO well (or adequately) or is it because its becoming popular? I think its the latter reason. Are we all in this newsgroup programming for the sake of programming or programming for the money or the ability to earn a living? Yeah, sad but true, but that's the answer... Raymond Wan