From 5492892387085324300
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f78e5,6788e79fcdcc2033
X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public
From: ted@cs.brown.edu (Tony Davis)
Subject: Re: auto_ptr::reset and auto_ptr::operator=
Date: 1995/09/20
Message-ID: <MATT.95Sep20164345@physics2.Berkeley.EDU>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 110455608
approved: matt@physics2.Berkeley.EDU (Matt Austern)
references: <199509111753.AA15077@xs1.xs4all.nl> <gregorDEtM0t.Hw2@netcom.com> <MATT.95Sep18131639@physics2.Berkeley.EDU>
organization: Brown University Department of Computer Science
newsgroups: comp.std.c++


Interesting.

In article <MATT.95Sep18131639@physics2.Berkeley.EDU> ted@cs.brown.edu (Tony Davis) writes:
> Just to clarify, you are saying that the standard will say that
> auto_ptr<T>::reset() does NOlete its pointee, correct?
                            ^^^^^^

That should say 'NOT delete', yes?


> Tony Davis
> ted@cs.brown.edu


Tony Davis
ted@cs.brown.edu


---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  Submission address: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu.
  Contact address: std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu.  The moderation policy
  is summarized in http://dogbert.lbl.gov/~matt/std-c++/policy.html. ]



