From 6636039340996589400 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f78e5,2011c154e12ede7e,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public From: krotoff@such.srcc.msu.su (Alexander Krotoff) Subject: inconsistance in over.over Date: 1996/02/01 Message-ID: <4eo2mk$7tc@boy.nmd.msu.ru>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 137508368 organization: Research Computer Center, Moscow State University x-original-date: 31 Jan 1996 18:43:16 +0300 x-auth: PGPMoose V1.1 PGP comp.std.c++ newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Hello c++ gurus, There is small inconsistance in the Oct 95 WP: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 13.4 Address of overloaded function [over.over] In the example on the end of the section: int (X::*p5)(int) = &(X::f); // error: wrong syntax for // pointer to member int (*p6)(long) = &(X::f); // OK1 Error: qualified-id enclosed in parentheses. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 5.3.1 Unary operators [expr.unary.op] 3 A pointer to member is only formed when an explicit & is used and its operand is a qualified-id not enclosed in parentheses. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- I suppose the error is in the over.over. -- Alexander N. Krotoff krotoff@such.srcc.msu.su Research Computer Center tel: +7(095)939-2638 Moscow State University fax: +7(095)939-4430 --- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. Submission address: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu. Contact address: std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu. The moderation policy is summarized in http://dogbert.lbl.gov/~matt/std-c++/policy.html. ]