From 672946494733355906 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f78e5,8c9f1307b83ac2db X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public From: "Cristian Georgescu" Subject: Re: Q: virtual functions not overridable anymore? Date: 1997/09/12 Message-ID: <01bcbf53$2ccaa4c0$183274cf@worldnet.worldnet.att.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 271987095 References: <01bcb109$1e790180$433574cf@worldnet.worldnet.att.net> <3404A0AE.6F7E@Eng.Sun.COM> <5uimip$l56@bgtnsc03.worldnet.att.net> <340D93AA.643A@Eng.Sun.COM> <01bcb951$ea80a440$909c389d@mtayler> <34166C9E.1882@pratique.fr> <5v719t$7g1@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> X-Original-Date: 12 Sep 1997 08:11:32 GMT Organization: Opal Technologies X-Auth: PGPMoose V1.1 PGP comp.std.c++ iQBVAwUBNBmpZ0y4NqrwXLNJAQGfIAH/XkwtQ/ye8LO4r6bvqZ5xe4+DO1DdCO3v Fq/qmHI6iIlvDnBNojrKVUE9LTNyqIAG4YdAvuLzp77gyOuijIkyzA== =KlGg Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Originator: austern@isolde.mti.sgi.com Fergus Henderson wrote in article <5v719t$7g1@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU>... > Even in a hypothetical language C+=42 that did allow such dynamic class > creation and runtime derivation, the principle would not always apply. > If you're using private inheritence, then that the fact that > `foo' "is-a" `bar' is private, and so classes derived from `foo' > should not be able to take advantage of that. > You can override a virtual private function from the base class. But this is another problem. -- Cristian Georgescu _________________________________________________ Smith Industries Aerospace & Defense Systems 7-9 Vreeland Road, Florham Park, NJ 07932, USA. _________________________________________________ E-mail: Georgescu_Christian@si.com --- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles: Try just posting with your newsreader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu comp.std.c++ FAQ: http://reality.sgi.com/austern/std-c++/faq.html Moderation policy: http://reality.sgi.com/austern/std-c++/policy.html Comments? mailto:std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu ]