From -7055518599429664572 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f78e5,fe6310a7fb6a4c8c X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public From: Oleg Zabluda Subject: Re: const int& or int const& Date: 1998/02/06 Message-ID: <6bbhgt$n7@marianna.psu.edu>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 322700232 References: <34D8AD3C.5C38416B@heidelbg.ibm.com> X-Original-Date: 5 Feb 1998 00:08:45 -0500 X-Server-Date: 5 Feb 1998 04:32:36 GMT Organization: Penn State University, Center for Academic Computing X-Auth: PGPMoose V1.1 PGP comp.std.c++ iQBVAwUBNNta6Ey4NqrwXLNJAQEdXAIAq9Ugo1Fk4eT2ZRkIp7kreXj3s3VUxiPN lat/C/C3GIxBZKkNjGZeidEyrwMy3Uy0VuRbmX/APjuA2Ng0S1reRw== =Vqhj Reply-To: zabluda@math.psu.edu (Oleg Zabluda) Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Originator: austern@isolde.mti.sgi.com Martin Neimeier wrote: : What is the difference between the three method-headers ? : void foo(const in& foo_var); : void foo(int const& foo_var); : void foo(const int const& foo_var); The first two are identical, the third is illegal. Oleg. -- Life is a sexually transmitted, 100% lethal disease. --- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ] [ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://reality.sgi.com/austern/std-c++/faq.html ]