From -5737840772109839247 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f78e5,66d20309909372f6 X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public From: Valentin Bonnard Subject: Re: STL and set_union algorithm question? (newbie to STL!) Date: 1998/04/09 Message-ID: <352C74D1.3B6F@pratique.fr>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 342416093 Approved: Fergus Henderson Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <6g2te9$a7n$1@ukwsv3.ggr.co.uk> <35290568.2781@wizard.net> <352A9B77.2781E494@pratique.fr> <6gelt5$mpp@marianna.psu.edu> <6gh6t6$ptn@marianna.psu.edu> X-Original-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 1998 09:12:17 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: Ecole Normale Superieure, Paris, France X-Auth: PGPMoose V1.1 PGP comp.std.c++ iQBFAgUANSzUguEDnX0m9pzZAQGfFQF9ErMFBY8dKx9e91qmvn1qwR5d77xoU4h4 jccWofNiX/kg4s+9UGkCqn8uC8AZwdYJ =0eFI Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Oleg Zabluda wrote: > I just want it to be non-convertible to set<>::const_iterator. I understand your opinion. You may also want cont::iterator not to be convertible to cont::iterator, for any T != U, which would mean that vector::iterator can't be a pointer. I think it's should be possible to avoid direct use of primitive types entirely, but it's too early to impose that given the fact that using an object (class) instead of a built-in incurs a penalty under a number of compilers. -- Valentin Bonnard mailto:bonnardv@pratique.fr info about C++/a propos du C++: http://pages.pratique.fr/~bonnardv/ --- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ] [ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://reality.sgi.com/austern_mti/std-c++/faq.html ]