From -5614730130409375921 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f78e5,a69618ea97f65037 X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public From: ark@research.att.com (Andrew Koenig) Subject: Re: nested functions Date: 1998/04/30 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 349491160 Approved: stephen.clamage@sun.com (comp.std.c++) Sender: nntp@research.att.com References: <6hac23$8lb$1@news2.isdnet.net> <6i7h14$e33$1@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> Mime-Version: 1.0 Originator: clamage@taumet X-Nntp-Posting-Host: raptor.research.att.com X-UID: 0000000001 X-Status: $$$T Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: AT&T Research, Florham Park, NJ Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ In article <6i7h14$e33$1@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU>, Fergus Henderson wrote: > >It might be possible to avoid the > >space overhead by using the `trampoline' technique, but that requires > >the ability to generate code in data space, which not every processor > >supports. > There are trampoline-based techniques that do not require the > ability to generate code in data space. Maybe so, but they did not surface during the committee's discussions. -- --Andrew Koenig ark@research.att.com http://www.research.att.com/info/ark [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ] [ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://reality.sgi.com/austern_mti/std-c++/faq.html ]