From 9135605137002786204 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f78e5,953748e81bf9ec65 X-Google-Attributes: gidf78e5,public From: James Kuyper Subject: Re: Class String of Standard Date: 1998/06/12 Message-ID: <35814811.167E@wizard.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 362062321 X-NNTP-Posting-Host: gscsgi02.gsfc.nasa.gov Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Approved: stephen.clamage@sun.com (comp.std.c++) References: <6lcfss$q3v$1@duke.telepac.pt> <6lhfm1$q74$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <6lj1j8$34d$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <6lmmml$9sb$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> X-UID: 0000000001 X-Status: $$$T Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center -- Greenbelt, Maryland USA Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Originator: clamage@taumet J. Kanze wrote: ... > A call to c_str or data DOES invalidate all iterators and references > into the string. I found a statement that c_str() and data() invalidate references returned by operator[]; since at() is defined in terms of operator[], those references are also invalidated. I couldn't find a similar statement about the iterators; where is it? [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ] [ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ] [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ] [ FAQ: http://reality.sgi.com/austern_mti/std-c++/faq.html ]